#19775
Hi:
I want to buy a rife machine, and am looking into the FScan2 and others. I have read that Analog machines are better than the digital ones as the frequencies "waver" back and forth over the dialed up frequency. I have read that this is better so that if any viruses, bacteria or pathogens have mutated up or down slightly in frequency, the frequency dialed up will catch this.
Is this true? Is an analog machine better than a digital one?
I have worked with the SCIO and QXCI with a practitioner, and would like to buy one, but can't afford the price tag... I like the idea of the FScan2 as it can scan and tell you what is resonating, much like the SCIO, but none of the analog ones I've seen can do this.
What is the consensus on this amongst users?
Thanks!