On the noon news they had a segment on the VALUE of Hormone Replacement Therapy, H.R.T.
...With great warnings about 'side-effects' and that some people become very ill. (Breast cancer is a major side effect.)
Folks, if the 'study' results were falsified in the first place, don't they have to go back to square #1 and 'restudy'?
Where are the results of that restudy?
Are they basing their statements of the usefulness of HRT on the accidental results obtained from a public conned into an unnecesary 'treatment'?
Sounds more like 'damage control', and 'promotion', to me.
...With us as the saps.