Colloidal Silver Articles for the TRUTH
Grizz, what truth would that be??
All I read was an opinion from somebody that makes CS generators.
No sources, authored by one individuals for the "News", whatever that is.
On top of that, all the links to the company aren't working.
Highly suspect. I would advise believing it being the "truth" until he posts some credible sources that can prove what he has said as fact.
The only thing he gets credit is that he states that in vitro data is different that what actually happens within the body.
Nobody that I have read has stated that Ionic silver causes agryia. In fact it has been reported that the process of making the CS , and the amount consumed were the primary factors for agryia.
I just tested all the links that I provided in my message, and they all work just fine. Which links do not work?
The links on the home page where you got that information.
His articles make a lot of sense to me.
I also LOVE all the features of their Silvertron Elite generator.
If you think so that's all that counts, but it is like night and day when presented as the "truth", in capital letters no less.
I have to many years of killing viruses, bacteria, infections, etc. , and I still haven't gotten agryia, so I had to have my say.
I hope you have good luck with your generator.
Kinda an old saw Griz: Lots of ideas and opinions which conflict. So ultimately your CS site may provoke a cutting thru the opinions with facts, cause you will have so many of both there.
You've installed a lot of info for those looking to compare makers and know more about Silver and it's benefits, but:
I went to the Siverton site, read some of the information and was pretty surprized you would think that this is a reliable CS site. The author writes, not of one side of a differing opinion in CS's debatable topics, but an unresearched diatribe (or gathered from other same such lay sources) which is in disagreement with basic published research on CS. His claims sound more like excuses for his machines abilities then verified truth about which style CS is most efficacious.
As the Silverton site says, theres a lot of disinformation about CS on the internet, and from my perusal the Silverton site is full of it.
Rebuttle to Silverton's statement that large (20nm) silver particles are safe and effective and smaller .8 nm sized silver particels are toxic, along with a short description of why small particled ionic silver safley bypass the gastric environment:
This link is full of pertinent important dissected information and an indictment of not only missleading and perverted (for who's benifit we ask) institutional research but also the main stream and alternative media's powerull and immediate role in influencing public opinion by promoting and propagandizing fallacies on sensitive to the powers at be subjects.
It may be insignificant in the real picture, so Ill wait to hear about your experiences with that maker's CS when you get it, and chalk up the rest to how different our motivated perceptions can be and how personal preferences and needs influence us to choose what it is we believe in.
It continues to suprize me how people acting as if experts in the Silver Water field erroneously use and mismatch meanings. Describing solution and molecular states counter to commonly held definitions about ions, coloids or solutions. Words that need not play into the charged atmosphere of the real debate on efficacy. So it seems that they are either uninformed or unresearched as to the definitions of the simple terms, or are copying someone else's writings wout any fact checking.