Nice mainstream smokescreen, but it won't float. We aren't talking about natural formadehyde produced in our bodies from eating wholesome unadulterated foods. We are talking about unnatural formadelhyde.
BTW, one very large source of metabolic by-product of formadehyde is the dangerous sweetener Aspartame, Aspartame also happens to be another lovely ingredient that is found in some vaccines. Is your logic that since we are exposed to toxic "natural" and industrial formadehyde on a regular basis it is therefore safe to inject unnatural formadehyde directly into our bloodstreams? That same logic must apply to a whole host of toxic ingredients in vaccines.
Don't for a minute try to throw a smokescreen at us about the "miniscule" amounts of formaldehyde in vaccines. The safe level for formadehyde exposure is 2 PPM, and that is exposure in general not exposure diredtly into the bloodstream. Some vaccines contain up to 27 PPM and more of formaldehyde. As a matter of fact, vaccines commonly contain PPM of dangerous toxins which exceed established safe exposure levels.
One example is the the Typhim Vi vaccine made by Aventis Pasteur USA. The listed ingredients, in addition to cell surface Vi polysaccharide from Salmonella typhi Ty2 strain, are aspartame, phenol, and polydimethylsiloxane (silicone).
Yes, you are quite correct. Vaccines are not injected into directly into the bloodstream - they are injected into the muscle, but we aren't vaccinating our muscles and the the intention is to have the vaccines absorbed into the bloodstream.
Perhaps I was wrong (it happens). Aspartame was widely listed at many sources as an ingredient for that vaccine when I did a search - but no, not at the CDC, scienbasedmedicine or skeptoid. Hardly sources that I look to for accuracy. I won't dispute the listed ingredients on the CDC list, but will point out that the list is well worth taking a look at and then doing a search for various of those ingredients plus side effects. Neurotoxins, mutagens, carcinogens, etc. Pretty horrific I'd say. And note how many vaccines include formadehyde.
I will also point out that the CDC is noted for being controlled by the vaccine industry and has been caught up in several related scandals. Look how they jumped on board the fake flu pandemic, for example. Skeptics can Google "CDC scandals coverups" to see much more of what I am talking about.
When it comes to sciencebasedmedicine and skeptoid, well you pick your trusted sources and I'll pick mine. Both of those sites are mainstream apologist sites and Sciencebasedmedicine features the infamous David Gorski, a legend in his own mind but in reality a little known assitant professor outside his blogs where he picks and chooses studies to suit his bias. All I need to know about Gorski came in his admission of how much he admired and loved being compared to defrocked mainstream tool Stephen Barrett and his various mainstream attack sites such as Quackwatch. If one needs to know more, a good read can be found here:
When it comes to my "misinformation" about vaccines being injected into the bloodstream, aren't we really picking at straws here? Direct injection into the bloodstream via IV would introduce the vaccines immediately into the bloodstream, but vaccined injected into the muscles are nevertheless absorbed quite rapidly into the bloodstream. Does it really matter if it is minutes versus a couple of hours? The end result is that vaccines are indeed introduced into the bloodstream.
Thanks for the link to the CDC list, btw. I will be sure to refer to it when I warn about the dangerous ingredients in vaccines.
No more merely my opinion of the untrustworthiness of those sites than it is merely your opinion of their trustworthiness. In my opinion of course.
People should indeed do their own research and they should not limit it to just the sites any one individual vouches for.
And I suppose you have ample proof that formaldehyde is absorbed more slowly and differently via injection into muscle and absorption into the bloodstream versus absorption via inhalation into the lungs? If there is better absorption and lesser dilution via inhalation, why don't they just have us inhale lesser amounts of vaccines and other medications instead of inject them?
Injected toxins still have to be absorbed into the bloodstream. How long do you think a 15 minute exposure would take? And how does that compare with the amount of time it takes an injected medications to enter the bloodstream? In case you don't have that information readily at hand - it usually takes about 20 minutes.
Keep in mind also that we aren't talking about the formaldehyde in a single vaccination - it is found in many, many different vaccinations.
Personally, I don't believe there is such a thing as a safe level of a toxic substance. Especially not when you consider that studies on toxic substances look only at one substance at a time and not at the health effects of combinations of toxic substances, such as the combinations found in many vaccines. Plus, the toxins injected in vaccines can combine with the thousands of other unnatural chemical compounds we are exposed to on a regular basis in the air we breathe, water we drink, food we eat. household chemicals we use and medications we take.
I choose to avoid toxins as best I can and regularly cleanse and detox for those I can't. That includes avoiding the toxins and unnatural compounds found in vaccinations and other mainstream medications.