There is a big difference between moderation and censorship. The debate forums needed cleaning up, but that is not what has happened. The posters making the bulk of the personal attacks, are still there, doing exactly that. As the moderator favours these posters, they attack with impunity. This is not cleaning up the boards, this is making the boards a free for all, for the favourites of the moderator.
The WM has effectively said that people cannot defend themselves against personal attack, or they become as bad as the attacker. This simply gives those that are able to attack with impunity, (those favoured by the moderator) a free ride, and this is very obvious on the debate forums.
If this is not addressed, I can see there will be a lot more decent people leaving CZ. This website will become the home of those could care less about healing, and are simply here to cause trouble. Particularly the ones that have been banned from the site, numerous times, and come back under new user names, to continue the trouble making. Until this is also addressed, then the problems will continue, and the good people will leave.
You are 100% correct!!! And again the problem is not limited to the debate forums. Moderators are abusing their position on the support forums as well.
Well something needs to change. And I don't want to infer that they are bad people or dishonest. None of them are trolls, regardless of the rhetoric. But I do think there needs to be some serious and legitimate moderating there. And I do think the slates need to be wiped clean and for the Webmaster to give some clear and unequivical direction on what will be accepted on the debate boards and what will cause a ban. We can't have haphazard moderating here. And Spud and Peggy shouldn't be banned. But. If I was the moderator there, well I personally would be hiding a massive amount of posts.The debate boards have become out of control. And it is very easy for legitimate posters to get carried away there. I know. I spent several years on there, and I will admit that I broke the TOS more then a couple of times. It gets emotional over there.
The problem is not limited to the debate boards, which is what Spud was also trying to point out. The same problem is on the other forums. We have moderators doing what they wish, which includes deleting posts that ARE NOT in violation of TOS, allowing TOS violations to remain if it fits their needs and repeatedly violating TOS themselves instead of doing the job they are supposed to do.
I did come on here last year to make the case for Tony Isaacs to be instated as a Global Moderator. I still do think that it is a great solution to a lot of these problems. Curezone is a big site, so it needs multiple moderators, but he has paid his dues here and has moderating experience on other sites, including serious ones where people are suffering from stage 4 cancer. Hopefully the Webmaster will reconsider this request. I can't think of anyone else I would rather have here making those tough decisions. He is a pro at it.
I strongly disagree with this. Tony is the best example on CZ of the complaints I pointed out above. In fact I have seriously considered leaving CZ altogether because of Tony's severe abuse as a moderator and the webmaster's refusal to do anything about it other than to delete the complaints and evidence I posted on my own forum.
Since we know that editing has been disabled on this forum I would like to know how you edited your post? I saw it when it first went up with a new username and within the body of the post you signed it with your other user name.
The next time I refreshed the page you had changed to an anon number, I understand you're testing the privacy settings but how were you able to edit your post to remove your old username out of the body of the post when editing posts has been disabled in this forum?
I don't think what Mo said added anything useful here, in fact it just fanned the flames, but was it a violation of the TOS? I guess that is up for interpretation. You saying,
"But Spud has every right to come here and speak her mind just you apparently have the right to come here and an obnoxious jerk."
That clearly violates both the TOS and the spirit of the website. Hey, you have been attacked as well, so I am not here to completely judge you. But as one of your fans, I will give you my take.
Hi Blackngold,
Yes, you are right. I should have worded that differently and not been so harsh. That was uncalled for. I just get frustrated about how certain people here on CZ try to dictate to others what they can and cannot say when people are merely trying to express their views and concerns. This has happened so many times to me here on CZ so I know what it is like, and I think these people are being very unfair to Spud. Spud, I and others here want to see some change for the better, and the only way there is going to be change is to point out the issues. The WM cannot read every post so the WM cannot be expected to know the issues going on unless presented. Spud has been doing a great job of this. People fighting her remind me of the people who sit there allowing their rights to be taken away by their government then decide to start bitching after their rights are already gone. Spud is being proactive by taking a stand against these injustices before they get any further out of hand and the only people left on CZ are those who are so unhappy in their lives that all they do is hang around CZ looking for things to complain about or fight about. Is this really what CZ should be about?
As a final note I pointed out earlier that CZ has rules. These rules are here for a reason. And if enforced properly they can make CZ a better place for everyone rather than just for the power abusing moderators selectively enforcing the rules to show how they can flex their power muscles.