Since when did you start believing what the gubnet is telling you.
Tony (DQ) is in denial.
Last year, the Hispanic population in Texas reached 51 percent.
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2005/0509fea3.asp
"""That doesn't look to me like hispanics will be taking over the country in my lifetime or my son's lifetime either and probably not even in his children's lifetime.""""
These statistics above probably dont take into account the real numbers of illegals or the real birth rates of them or illegals or even those hispanics who call themselves whites.
You now have contradicted your claim of white population increasing to 325.
"number of whites from about 243 million today to 325 million at midcentury - an increase of 82 million."
Now you haven't addressed the issue of 2 immigrants having 100 plus descendants in 80 years.
fertility rates in India are 2.7, considering the already have a billion people that is a big problem
http://www.globalhealthfacts.org/topic.jsp?i=89
"That doesn't look to me like hispanics will be taking over the country in my lifetime or my son's lifetime either and probably not even in his children's lifetime."
hispanics are already the majority in ten percent of counties, they will be the majority in many southern states
Denial? The only thing I deny is false information and irrational fear mongering based primarily on ethnic or religious background.
The catholic church site you quote got it wrong in that article from 2005. Maybe they meant to say that Hispanics became a majority of the Catholics in Texas in 2004, because they surely did not become a majority of the residents. Hmmm, does that mean we should expel Catholics or force mandatory birth control on them?
In 2009 Texas population was made up of 47.4% white persons non-Hispanic origin versus 36.5% Hispanic/Latino. Projections on when Hispanics might become a majority IF current immigation and birth rate trends hold true range anywhere from 2026 to 2035. A great percentage of the Hispanics in that period will not be voting age. And that is just Texas, one of the two most populous Hispanic states. Even if I should live to see the day when Hispanics rule the day in Texas or elsewhere, that really does not bother me that much anyway.
You are using the same kind of scare stats and fears that have been used for the Irish, blacks, commies, etc. and are also being used now for Muslims and Asians. This is not the White States of America, no matter how much some would like for it to be.
White persons are already a majority (47 percent) minority in Texas. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html
Ipso facto. Res Ipsa Loquitor.
America was a white 89 percent black 9 percent country for 200 years.
It was never an Hispanic Indian country for the first 200 years .
Hispanics are out breeding whites who have a declining birth rate 1.7, by a factor of 2 to 4 to 1.
There will be an Amnesty for the 20 to 40 million illegals here,after the amnesty will come an open border with Mexico. Even more will come here.
The NWO has PWNED YOU
A majority minority says nothing whatsoever about an Hispanic majority, which is what you originally contended.
Id est illusionem!
89 percent white 9 percent black and never an Indian country? If you want to use figures only for the areas after they became states and had pretty much wiped out or run off the Indians, you could say that it was not an American Indian country, but it surely was an American Indian continent and the area that came to ultimately make up today's present US was certainly American Indian. Even in the original 13 colonies there was a significant Indian population and they played major roles in the Revolutionary War. All those townships, counties, rivers and landmarks didn't get Indian names for nothing. Estimates of the Native American Indian population in what is now the US at the time of Columbus arrival range to 18 million.
Originally, every bit of the area that makes up the US today was Indian country, and most of it only became white country after the Indians had been killed off by war and disease, run off and/or relocated. The only exceptions were the areas such as California and Texas in the early 1800s which were predominately Hispanic until the whites took over their lands.
Seriously, have some True Blood. Tell Sookie I sent ya.
California had 10,000 hispanics in it in 1840 and 200,000 indians. So it was never an hispanic state.
http://www.oldcardboard.com/lsj/texians/popgrow.htm
"total population on the eve of the Texas Revolution in 1835 was about 35,000 people."
Of course the Native Americans owned the continent before the Europeans arrived.
The demographics of the USA from 1776 to 1976 were majority white,in total, but parts of the south may even had a majority of slaves at some points.
I certainly regret waking up to the new political reality.
Everything that I can imagine is coming true.
Nepotism familia (Mexican way of doing government business) is already here, see my post.
Like the guy said about OJ, there is not one bit of exculpatory evidence for painting a rosy picture of the
destruction of the white middle class.
Denial is better than reality. And you are old enough so you may not live to see the worst, and are isolated enough on your texas acreage to avoid the street violence.
But you can still read about it online, phoenix 2nd highest kidnapping rate in the world, gang wars,murders,rapes,driving the blacks out of so la
etc.
Motto of La Raza: Everything for the race,nothing for everyone else.
Its a beautiful day in the HOOD. (couldnt fing the Eddy Murphy version)