Nature Medicine 14, 819 - 821 (2008)
Published online: 27 July 2008 | doi:10.1038/nm.1850
Protein-in-adjuvant vaccines have shown limited success against difficult diseases such as blood-stage malaria. Here we show that a recombinant adenovirus–poxvirus prime-boost immunization regime (known to induce strong T cell immunogenicity) can also induce very strong antigen-specific antibody responses, and we identify a simple complement-based adjuvant to further enhance immunogenicity. Antibodies induced against a blood-stage malaria antigen by this viral vector platform are highly effective against Plasmodium yoelii parasites in mice and against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro.
Your post is nothing but a speculative announcement - take it to the Pro-Vaxx forum and see if it fits there. It is a non issue here.
Or do you somehow want to debate a rodent study for a vaccine that is made up of modified cold and pox viruses that has not entered safety tests in humans yet?
When and if it is approved, then we can take a look at issues like the ingredients it contains, any side effects they might admit to, and the major sources of funding for the study.
I note that the Jenner Institute division of Oxford College, which most of the researchers are associated with, derives much of it's funding from industry sources.
I also note the connection of one researcher to Imaxio, which is a vaccine manufacturer formerly known as Avidis. And one can scarcely dismiss the other listed connections as non industry related. After all, Imaxio itself was founded in 2000 as a spin-off from the Medical Research Council, UK and Cambridge University, UK and has acquired the French company Diagnogene in 2006.
DQ
What a pathetically weak response that addressed nothing in the post I made. Although you are keeping in form with your slurs and multiples IDs, you really are a mere shadow of your former self and not even worth trifling with.
Just like in the past, I have nailed your butt to the wall and your only response is to comeback with a putdown because you cannot refute the facts I posted.
And you dare say that we refuse to look at the facts. Tsk, tsk . . .
DQ
Funny how virtually the same exact denials were made by over a dozen other illegal name calling, slurring multiple ID's that all traced back to one person - and where are they today? Identified as illegal and rules breakers and gone, that's where. Meanwhile, here I still am - free to post in any forum and never so much as a warning.
Put that in your pipe and stew on it. And BTW, you HAVE been identifed as having at least three different ID's. Or is there a three different people who have all the same characteristics using the same computer?
DQ