I thought his descriiption was pretty dead on. Chris has never seen any non mainstream conspiracy she will even consider being possible - pretty amazing since she was poisoned by mercury amalgam fillings and there has been a mainstream conspiracy to cover up the truth about those for decades.
Far from informative, the link posted to contains the same mainstream apologist information that has been concocted to explain what cannot be explained. For example, a controlled demolition does not necesarily fall at free fall speed. That depends on the timing of the charges and also depends on the fact that as the building collapses it's fall is slowed by the building compacting on remaining structures within the building.
Numerous demolition experts, scientists and college professors have tesitified just the opposite of the information in that link - and some have lost their jobs for being brave enough to speak the truth.
Think back, Roky. Bush was carefully groomed and put in office for the purpose of further eroding freedom and liberty and securing the power of those who would lead us to a one world government. False flag operations have been a time tested method to rally the people behind a government, and if you recall, at the time of the bombings the country was in a miasma, with a very large portion of it believing quite correctly that the election had been rigged and Bush was not the duly elected President.
A better source of information is 911truth.org - where they have 1,228 pages of articles. And the people there are far from just a collection of kooks. If you like informing yourself, here are a few of their links:
> Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11th, 2001
> A Quick Course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
> 9/11 Victims' Families' Review of 9/11 Commission Report
> David Griffin's "The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie"
> Loss of Civil Liberties since 9/11; a timeline from Cooperativeresearch History Commons
> Beginners' Guide to 9/11 Truth from Journal of 9/11 Studies
> AE911Truth.org's Technical Papers
> Who's asking questions? ... Patriotsquestion911.com
"A couple of guys working for a couple of days couldnt do it unless they used a Nuke."
Who says they only spent a couple of days? Maybe it helped to have Bush's brother handling security at the WTC.
Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne]
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."
The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites.
One has to wonder about the firemen reporting the charges going off. One really has to wonder why the buildings' owner took out new hugely increased insurance policies on the building days before the attack. Building seven's collapse simply cannot be explained - especially the overheard and recorded instructions to "bring it down", and two TV stations broadcasting reports that it was down before it actually happened.
Like NWO insider Henry Kissinger stated, nothing like a false flag terrorist event to gain control of the people. Hell, Roky, old Kissingnazi is probably an illegal alien too.
DQ, the majority of engineers believe that the collapse of the buildings can be explained by scientific and engineering principles, although obviously there is a percentage that doesn't. I am not going to rehash that whole debate (collapse speed, temperatures etc.). Most people side with one camp or the other and the debate usually goes nowhere. I will, however, talk about an aspect of this that doesn't seem to get much ink and that is Dubya's role in the whole affair.
I ask you - is this the face of a super genius tactician that was able to pull off what certainly would be one of the most brilliant secret operations in modern times?? Make no doubt about it, if the 911 conspiracy is true then it is brilliant because most Americans don't buy it - hence it has succeeded. Number one, he was in office only a relatively short time before 911, but more importantly he has the brains of a duck. George Bush has a hard time just tieing his shoe laces. You ever seen the pictures of him at the elementary school on 911 looking like a doped up deer caught in the headlights? If he was acting then he should be bringing home multiple academy awards. Unfortunately, what I think we were seeing was the real George Bush. Bush couldn't plan a pool party for a bunch of six year olds without one of them drowning. The muslims that boarded those planes had five times the smarts that Dubya has. RB is correct in saying that Bush didn't plan or implement this thing. If it truly was a conspiracy then it was planned and implemented by members of the Government who are out of the public eye or all they had was advance knowledge of a plot and they just let it happen. Bush would have been completely out of the loop. It was one thing to think in 2001-2003 that he was the mastermind but we now have almost 8 years of youtube clips of him showing his true colors. Show me one major policy that he has implemented that has succeeded. Bush don't got no Midas touch - unfortunately everything he touches wilts.