One of the main objectives of BTI is increasing the ph of certain body fluids but not blood.
So your observatons are saying absolutely "no" to BTI as well?
I can honestly say I share some of your concerns regarding bicarbonate. What I will say is that I take it nonetheless! oh and also
http://earthlink.com
Here you can find hundreds of people who take it and appear grateful. Please post a comment here and see how they respond to your characterization. I can't wait for this one!
I am curious why you choose to use the term, "wipe out," when referring to stomach acid and bicarbonate. Any lay person who reads this autoimatically knows that bicarb neutralizes the ph of stomach acid, doesn't wipe it out! We all know that sooner or later stomach acid ph returns to it's previous levels, the body simply secretes more HCl acid. Even you know this! So why did you go there?
And what is your major concern? That the bicarb wont let you absorb a mineral?
Just in this instance alone it looks like your post is lacking objectivity.
WHen you lack objectivity people will tend to be skeptical about your posts.
Just wanted to point that out for your benefit.
People miss the point of bicarbonate and so have you.
It reduces CO2 partial pressure. I will cut and paste that entire chemical equation that is right out of biochemistry book.
With cancer I have repeatedly stated that baking soda is not so effective for cancer as the possitive ion sodium does not cross over into cancer cells.
After all, people live off of tums who have g.e.r.d. and they take sodium bicarbonate too. Where are the horrible consequences resulting in FDA recalls.
If they have "wiped out" their stomach acid, have you written your concern to the FDA? How about 'Arm and Hammer' who has oral consumption directions right on their box? Have you written them about their dangerous bicarbonate?
Why do you have to pick on chronic illness sufferers to do your bidding.
You are right, there are some viruses that survive in higher ph mediums. Why because they go into dormancy when environment can't support it.
Retrovirus, adenovirus, and epstein barr viruses, are the main ones we are talking about, not just any old virus. And you are still right, higher ph may not kill these viruses, and yes it is theory that higher ph will bring about dormancy. My college major was microbiology! So, although I can't remember everything, I feel I can speak confidently about specifics. They are using alkaline therapies for hepatitis now. Why?
Besides, what is wrong with trying to attack an organism by how it breaths anyway.
With respect to Warburg, (how many Nobel Peace Prizes does he have?)
Please don't throw cancer patients off the main point with your bantering and argumentative style!
Oxygen therapies can be basically useless in some cancer, although almost every possitive outcome of cancer treatments are from oxygen type therapies. You mentioned hyperbaric, but unless cancers ph reaches an alkalinity threshold it will not absorb oxygen. I have preached this, but you haven't listened.
As I have pointed out over and over, all the O2 in the world is useless if you can't burn it or if it doesn't enter the cancer cell. Did you ignore these points or just miss them on purpose!
I had a
Breast Cancer patient, she was on everything that looks like an oxygen therapy. I was impressed. Her cancer spread to her bones anyway, and she was really dejected even though she was on several protocols and they had no affect during her stage IV. Her protocol was impressive but minus one thing, something to elevate ph. She was giving up and I begged her not to. I told her to hang on for 14 more days. We hooked her up to cesium supplier. 48 hours later her pain went away in her bones and she then stopped radiation that she used to help with the bone pain.
Well, that was six months ago. She emailed me last week. I will be posting her email for people just like you to see. I haven't showed her your postings yet.
I don't think she will like what you are claiming and how you are going about it.
So, you are always right,...half right.
LOOK
Whether cancer loves acid or produces acid, whether the acid is byproduct or intentional, whether cancer hates oxygen or is indifferent to oxygen one thing we both agree on that it ferments glucose! This, producing acid. It's been proven lower ph prevents O2 absorbtion, this has been proven.
If you were going to discover a cure for this disease, how would you capitolize upon this fact, cancer ferments glucose?
True oxygen inside of cancer cell can be like increasing the size of space shuttle's gas tank,...you have a heavier ship and can't burn the fuel any faster or better. It can't fly any faster or further. More fuel means nothing.
What I am clearly stating is that you need not just add a larger gas tank and more fuel, you also need to expand the fuel pump capacity.
Once you increase the fuel pump capacity, Now all this extra weight becomes extra energy, extra thrust, and better performance. You can now travel a little further.
Every cancer protocol I've witnessed working on cancer patients, (70% efficacy mind you.) involves citrate, coenzyme q, and carboxylic acid.
All of these facilitate Krebs cycle. Help burn all that lovely oxygen you have admitted may be present but just ineffective.
IT has been proven,...I mean proven that high doses of citrate stops, prevent, halts, forbids glycolysis and fermentation. So why would any logical person who has read these ph studies, ever recommend plain oxygen without alkaline substance and without Coq10 and citrate? So, you are right about oxygen not being therapeutic in some instances,...half right!
Lastly, the magnesium oxide thing. Please forward your concerns to the FDA and the thousands of retailers you can legally purchase this product from.
You are right that it forms- MG(OH)2, in water. In stomach acid it doesn't! It carries out the same acid base reaction that buffering agents do.
Do you know what you get when you mix MGO with HCL? Oh yeah!
Even if every miligram of MGO was converteted to mgoh2 the dosing is tolerance dependant. There is a recommended dose. Those that take MGOH2 in high enough amounts to cause laxative affect, they do run a risk of complications with continued use in this fashion. Magnesium does enter cancer cells though.
What is your point again about magnesium oxide.
What does hydrogen peroxide do if you drink too much, yet this therapy is legal in many states, they inject it venously, it doesn't destroy the body. It doesnt harm the veins. People drink oral peroxide. Isn't it caustic? You bet it is! Poor it on your skin! Why aren't you jumping up and down about H202.
Everything is relative, and you know this, and so does the average lay person!
Heck,snake venom can kill you, does this mean in micro doses it can't benefit anyone? They use gila monster venom for diabetics and other diseases now. Please hurry post a message how lizard venom can kill you so that suffering diabetics can't be treated.
This is exactly what you are doing. Scaring people away from therapies using half truths.
After all baking soda and a vitamin supplement are so much more dangerous than cancer itself, according to you!!! Do you see how rediculous your antics are?
What you have effectively done, especially with cancer, is taken an illness that normall kills people, and told these sufferers and fighters not to take these substances.
Never mind that all have clinical, laboratory studies supporting their efficacy. Albeit some of it is indeed animal and invitro data, I must admit.
So, as usual, you are right about everything,....half right.
The huge issue I have is that the part of you that is half wrong is the part where you scare away dying people from therapies that could never be as severe as the disease itself. This is totally immoral so please stop!
Baking soda my friend will never, ever, ever be as dangerous as cancer!!!!!!!
You have no study or evidence that disproves efficacy towards any illness with many things in BTI or it's principals. There are a few bad studies that the A.M.A. has latched onto however, closing eyes to mountains of other data.
All you have is your conclusions based upon side affects, conjecture, exagerations, mischaracterizations,assumptions, and loosely connected facts, and you do what with them,....you imply that vitamins are more dangerous than killer diseases.
I don't know how anybody of decency can sit there and activily discourage people from taking anything that has all of the following going for it:
a) Is non toxic at recommended dose b) Is not as dangerous as the disease itself even in higher dose c) Has case histories, or clinical data supporting efficacy d) Has lab data supporting efficacy or Has a licensed expert promoting its efficacy (especially Nobel Prize Winning scientists) f)Provides a fight when we've been told there is no fight! h) Is suppose to be done under the supervision of primary care physician in the first place.
Why would anybody do this to a cancer patient or even M.S. patient is beyond my wildest imagination. I used to take your half-truths personally, but anybody can see you lack an objective affect and position. I laugh at your postings now. I trust many of them will too.
Meanwhile, it's ok to say you don't support a therapy. That is your right.
For two years I didn't support ESSIAC, I didn't scare people away from it either. Not the way you do.
Here I am after researching it for two years, Now I support it.
But if it makes you feel any better,....I still love ozone!!!
I'll say a prayer that you do not burn in hell for stearing people away from alternative therapies by implying the therapy could be more dangerous than the disease itself!! Because this my friend is not a very nice thing to do. Don't you understand, Death,pain, hopelessness are bad things?
Just go ahead. Please write in big letters, "BAKING SODA IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN CANCER."
Aren't you the same guy who stated 20,000 mg of oral ascorbates are dangerous even though they are infusing people with 80,000 to 100,000 mg intravenously in just about every state in the union?
Can't wait to show your postings to my
Breast Cancer client. Maybe she'll sponsor free protocols like Mr. Katz did for M.S. patients.
No wonder you wont reveal your identity or background! I wouldn't either if I were you.
Sincerely
Bret Peirce
ps
I'll see you in heaven.
A brief Descriiption of Body Chemistry BTI style:
A brief Descriiption of Body Chemist... 
#69242
16 y
3,091
