Educating not medicating, curezone's logo, if you don't believe in that don't read on!
Lets step back a bit and not worry about the book writer for a moment but concentrate on the product Miracle-Mineral-Supplement
I had made numerous attempts to advise and help (free of charge)MMS regarding it's dangerous strength before contacting any Government Depts. The response from Miracle-Mineral-Supplement
was I am wrong and Miracle-Mineral-Supplement
is O.K. I had stated that my concerns were for the health and safety of the users of MMS and suppliers not being aware they were breaking the law regarding labeling and shipping.
The response of we are big enough and old enough to make up our own minds has nothing to do with the legal requirements of a chemical supplier. MMS claims it is not stabilized oxygen, the product that led to MMS. Well it is exactly the same just a different strength. At the same time of the claimed inventing of MMS, stabilized oxygen was in court and owners fined $375,000.00 for making false claims, the exact same claims now made by MMS.
MMS claims to be chlorine dioxide, it is not.
MMS even when activated is not chlorine dioxide, it is ASC (Acidified Sodium Chlorite)
Any FDA or EPA approvals claimed by MMS will never and have never any relation to the applications claimed by MMS
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) claims by MMS are all misconscrewed. Ascorbic acid is commonly used in the food processing industry as the activator for sodium chlorite for the extension of shelf life, so the vitamin C tablet being concentrated is activating the residual chlorous acid from the MMS taken prior.
MMS claims as it is chlorine dioxide it is approved as a food additive, they are wrong, the approval ClO2 has, is for an additive in the process water used in the washing or processing of produce.
Claims by MMS regarding Alcides Sanova system are very misleading, Sanova has approvals for ASC up to 1200 ppm is correct, but all the free ClO2 is drawn of prior to use and it is chlorous acid that works as the bacteriostat.
Claims by MMS that the 1ppm of chlorine dioxide in it's protocol is the same as in drinking water that you drink are false, treatment is done at 0.8 ppm and there should be none at point of use.
1 ppm as claimed by MMS is 10 times the OH&S allowable daily intake, multiply that 10 X the up 250 ppm that MMS protocol actually is and add it up for yourself.
Claims by MMS supporters that tests have only been done on rats are close to correct, when the rats die or show adverse reactions they don't do tests humans, the information on 2 tests done on humans both showed lymphatic (i think) problems.
Someone has died from inhaling ClO2 at 19ppm and that is 130 times less than what MMS protocol is. Workers subject to ClO2 at 3 ppm for 5 years showed 11 out of 13 had respiratory problems.
MMS claims of detoxing are false, it is impossible to remove (as they say) biofilm from the intestinal tract as claimed, I will happily explain if asked. It is ClO2 poisoning.
Why is it your to scared to ring a supplier of this chemical and ask, or the poisons information centre, or a doctor, but you will happily listen to "my friend is a chemist and said" Why do you think with all the rubbish on the net about it that there is no tests and trials for it's use as a medicine, because it does not cure and there is not no credible and supported bit of evidence regarding it's use. Are you all using the secret 3 X the strength product. Why don't you question a Dr. with a PhDtH as there is no such thing except for the new book writer. Why do accept a review for Ms medical claims by a Dr who has a PhD in literature. Do you think a site MMSDr.com is not deceiving when it is the initials of the blogger, why not MMSDR.com, why the implication to Dr.
Educating not medicating to me is about
and evaluating and then making up your mind.
You can read from the posts just below what happens here, ever since being on this site accusations that are false keep flying from all directions, that I am posting as others, that I am selling against MMS, that I am not in the Industry etc, etc and it is still the same tonight, rmutu212 and joshner both of which are lies.
I don't care if I bore some, don't read, they don't get the private emails I do asking for advice. When I warned about vinegar activation no one cared, now they do, when I warned about the citric activation protocol being wrong, why now do some sites promote what I said, when I warned about the cure claims and health and safety concerns did MMS retractions go up everywhere.
It would be pretty simple to, and forget the 28% is needed as that is a lie, make a safe strength with supported claims for use.
Now there is one major point I must raise, I don't believe in ingesting MMS, but I have no problems with the exact same product that is sold at safe strengths and all have the exact same testimonials as MMS but are not activated to produce ClO2. Funny that all these people claiming the same benefits with a product 6 X weaker and not activated. As a supplier of this chemical to Industry I do not have one application where I treat at the amount of ClO2 that MMS protocol produces, you would need only 1/40 of a drop of MMS for my highest.
I will answer any questions anyone has regarding the above, what is written is not a challenge, it is a fact.