Obama and his wife, granny and preacher remind me of a Bob Dylan classic -
"While preachers preach of love that hates
and teachers stand behind their gates
even the president of the United States
must sometimes stand naked"
which is a scary thought when it comes to our next president, Queen Hillary. Surely you are wise enough to know that the "real powers" has long ago decided that Hillary is to be annointed as the next puppet president in the charade we call democratic elections?
The republicans have had their turn, during which Bush revealed himself as the true NWO neo-con tool in his second term, and it is now the Democrats turn in the NWO game of presidential ping pong, though it really matters not who wears the face on the puppet mask. Between Bush abandoning and backstabbing much of the core Republican constituency and the "powers" maneuvering to give McCain the Republican nod we are pretty much assured a Democratic victory by the ignorant sheeple - and if not, there are always the Diebold machines.
Obama was given a free ride to create a bit of drama and entertainment, but clearly he is too green and a liability. So instead, we will see fake drama heading into the convention and during the early stages, but what will likely emerge is a unified and unbeatable ticket of Queen Hillary and Obama as her VP - which he will happily take after being promised a future presidency of his own after he gains a term or two of needed "seasoning".
If I were Hillary, though, I would keep a closer watch my back closer than on Bills wild willie - somebody as hateful and crazy as that racist preacher might decide that they got robbed by the evil white man and take action to put one of "their people"in the top spot.
jmho of course
DQ.
Back during the election when slick Willlie first ran for president, my father called and begged me not to vote for him. I told him no way I could vote for Bush after he sold his soul and abandoned his principles to get elected.
He said, well in that case vote for Perot, anybody but that damn Clinton. And I replied that Perot was far too paranoid, even though correct on many issues, and that he was such a huge outsider he would surely farkle the wheels of government.
And then I said "Hey Dad - look at it my way. If ever there was a perfect candidate for me it is Bill Clinton: he smokes pot, protested the war and chases women."
After a long moment of shocked silence, my father began laughing and said "well, at least you are honest about it - that sorry SOB claims he never inhaled!"
Ah the younger days of ignorant bliss. Now I fear I am becoming my father, who once was an ardent Democrat and now wants to discuss the latest bag of hot air from Rush. Now, I don't think I'll ever go THAT far but my world has certainly changed many degrees in the intervening years.
On the other hand, looking back at my description of why I liked Slick Willy I see that some things haven't changed so much after all.

America loves the minority candidate, no matter what qualifications or lack of judgment or anything else.
What kind of math did you take in high school MD?? You must have majored in Dubya's 'fuzzy mathematics'. How many minority Presidents have we had?? How many minorities in the Senate and House?? Minority House members only started appearing after Districts were created with minorities in the majority. Not too many majority white Districts vote em in when they have a white option. Maybe you should have ditched the State school for an Ivy League lol.
your posting history doesn't demonstrate that your primary aim in life is to teach the public at large on the foundations of Christianity, and I don't believe you have ever said anything that implies that you even consider yourself aiming for the task.
(Wow, ↑ that was a run-on sentence if I've ever written one!)
You are a conservative, as are many Christians, but none of your posts are representative of Christian thought per se. That is not a slight against you, just a fact.
But at any rate, even if you were a person involved in ministry leadership, and this is just conjecture on my part, but I doubt if your goals would be to ban the teaching of evolution and force public schools to teach Christianity, as Chris' sarcastic comment implies.
I wonder if there ever will be a time when you will actually read posts instead of jumping to irrelevant non-sequitors.
I could write a 20 foot long scroll, but I'm too tired and I want to get to bed, besides, since you don't read what's actually written, it may just be a waste of keyboard excersice.
Just two things:
1) I am not a socialist, communist or envious mal-content. I don't give a razzmatazz how much money you or anyone else makes. May you live long to enjoy it and purchase the entire globe if you like. When it's all over, make sure you know where your bus is making its last stop.
2) The original topic of this thread, was a statement made by Chris that if you could you would impose Christianity on everyone and ban the teaching of evolution in schools. Do you care to agree with Chris on that, MD?!? Anyway, I responded that you, are no spokeperson for Christianity. How you have managed to twist and skew this whole thing and bring it to more ludicrous assumptions and conclusions -- beats me.
Do me a favor Dew, you're allowed to hate me if you will, for any stance I take over which you vehemently disagree. But please, don't bicker with me over assumed ideas, especially the really very dumb ones.