America's Founding Documents
Is the "philosophy of the United States" a contravention to the unincorporated "united states of America"?
Date: 12/5/2017 5:27:07 PM ( 8 d ) ... viewed 118 times
December 5, 2017 -
Just "stumbled" upon this page and naturally it immediately caught my heightened attention when I saw that only two of the four Organic Laws are presented as "America's Founding Documents". I will inquire as to why the second and third Organic Laws were omitted from this page.
I also see: "These three documents, known collectively as the Charters of Freedom, ... are considered instrumental to its founding and philosophy of the United States." I can comment on this after I begin my inquiry (mentioned above).
The question that I submitted to the National Archives:
Your page: "America's Founding Documents" only presents two of the four Organic Laws yet the other two Organic Laws are published in the United States Code. What about including these as well at your page on "America's Founding Documents"?
Just posted the following comment at YouTube:
Came here via 3 pages of search results for "philosophy of the United States" (a phrase I saw at the National Archives re: Founding Documents). This subject matter requires a fully-informed orientation to the four Organic Laws otherwise the conventional "wisdom" (government schooled) can only fuel confusion. I certainly appreciate Randy's reply in this clip. However the idea of "The Original Purpose of the US Constitution" is not actually answered here. What Randy said pertained only to the first Organic Law. If we could preserve that as well as the second Organic Law then we wouldn't need a so called "Constitution" that subsequently was co-opted by private interests that are foreign to and in opposition to the first two Organic Laws.
Just sent a message to Randy:
Thank you for your reply at "The Rubin Report" () that I just enjoyed moments ago.
I'm very interested in knowing your further thoughts regarding the "Constitution". -
Does the fact that George Washington was duly elected as "President of the United States of America" yet gave an oath of office for "President of the United States" indicate any kind of possible conflict or inconsistency in your thinking?
If not then what may you have to say about the statement made by Hermann Göring when “Stahmer cued Goring to explain where the idea had come from to combine the ceremonial head of state and the head of government in one person, Adolf Hitler. That was simple, Goring explained. They had taken their example from the similar dual roles of the president of the United States.” - Nuremberg: Infamy on Trial Reprint Edition by Joseph E. Persico.()
December 13, 2017 - Re: "How Did Hitler Become So Evil?" -
The following comment (with minor edits) - was just submitted at the "Conservative Book Club". -
Although we have a virtually undisputed history in the court room referred to below you won't find the inspiration for the making of the German dictator included in the United States history books.
In a suggested letter by my Law professor (Dr. Ed Rivera) to the former presidential candidates Ed quotes from a DVD version of the Nuremberg Trial.
“Stahmer cued Goring to explain where the idea had come from to combine the ceremonial head of state and the head of government in one person, Adolf Hitler. That was simple, Goring explained. They had taken their example from the similar dual roles of the president of the United States.” - Nuremberg : Infamy on Trial Reprint Edition by Joseph E. Persico.
I find this a rather electrifying verification!
In the meanwhile here's another reference to the above:
“Goring even claimed that when Hitler subverted Germany’s republican constitution by amalgamating the offices of chancellor and president, he was merely emulating the powers of the office of President of the United States, which merged the roles of head of government and head of state.”[i]
In other words - George Washington took an oath for office for "President of the United States" after he had already been elected as "President of the United States of America". The former office is the head of government and the later is the head of state. Ever since then the American government has continuously combined these two offices into one person making him the most powerful (in public view). This was the sole source of inspiration behind how "Hitler subverted Germany’s republican constitution".
What American readers most need now is a redirection from "Hitler" (and every other external form of what may be considered as a form of entertainment and/or distraction) and a due-diligent focus toward a deeper understanding of the true nature of the United States government. The one place I know where that can be had is the Organic Laws Institute.[ii]
 "Re-writting History":
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites!