Could The Term "Legal Food Rights" Be An Oxymoron?
Distinguishing between Natural Law Rights and legal privileges; Lawful remedies vs. legal snares.
Date: 8/4/2012 11:24:09 PM ( 5 y ) ... viewed 1154 times
If one does not freely exercise their food Rights then the courts are probably the last place to be granted those Rights! This was demonstrated to be the case in Wisconsin this past year.
Individual Americans who are concerned about their Rights need to know that the courts (along with other "legal" entities) deal with corporate privileges and therefore are not really concerned about "protecting" your Rights. The courts are most certainly not the source of your Rights! They're in the business of generating revenue (i.e. fines, imprisonment, etc.) based on corporate State privileges (licenses, etc.). Rights are beyond their interests because real Rights are not licensed.
However, if you want food-related privileges then the State will be happy to offer you some licenses as well as a complete fee schedule for your faithful contributions. Then you'll have to check with the State (possibly on a daily basis) to learn the updates for all their regulations involving your privilege so that you can be totally compliant, otherwise you will be subject to fines and worse in addition to your annual fees.
But if you convert a Right to a privilege then you are literally selling out your birthrights. (See Esau)
On the other hand, if one has food Rights (as well as property Rights) then every adverse action by any "foreign" agent (and beginning with the initial trespass) must be immediately responded to in ways that hold each individual trespasser fully accountable for their trespass. Every time an individual trespass is allowed, without an immediate response that effectively (and fully Lawfully) repels the trespasser, then the actions of trespassers will have the appearance of some kind of legal justification. It's called "Color of Law".
Waiting to respond until the agencies present their trespass in court (as if it were a genuine legal issue) is simply a snare that is best avoided! There is no Lawful reason to voluntarily walk into that snare, unless you had contracted with the agency before hand (with a license or the like). The reason why more consideration isn't put on first repelling the trespassers and then holding them fully accountable (by any and all lawful means) before any legal actions begin is (IMO) symptomatic of the legal realm's conditioning upon the American psyche.
The American psyche needs healing from the ongoing assaults (that in my lifetime began with the assassination of John F. Kennedy plus the coverup by the government). Seeking the Truth of the political assassinations, murders of American Citizens, financial meltdowns, and any other act involving the government that has in any way injured American people is a necessary part of the healing that is needed nation wide. That healing process can be supported with good nutrition. For many Americans, nutrient-dense foods are their medicine! They truly have "let food be (their) medicine" just as Hippocrates declared over 2,000 years ago!
Healing is part of natural law. Any man-made law that is used to deny an individual to their Right to heal deserves to be immediately corrected. In "The Lawful Remedy" we read: "We have a right to natural action, which becomes a duty to correct when there is an obstruction to that."
I highly recommend to the book!
Without prejudice -
and without the "United States"
By Chef Jem
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites!