James’ approach to health challenges is dramatically different from most formulators – he takes into account the chemistry, anatomy and physiological factors, he formulates his line to address these factors and to produce a desired result.
So yes, you were so described and also described as a herbal formulator who takes chemistry into account.
That is not the same as your claim "Then again, I note that you are described elsewhere on the internet as actually being "a formulating chemist that specializes in herbs."
So exactly where does it say I am a "formulating chemist that specializes in herbs"? Because I took in to account the design of my model rockets when building them did this make me a rocket scientist?
As for your other comment:
"Not quite the same as a true "herbalist", or at least a traditional herbalist, is it?"
The same applies to your potentially dangerous and unproven oleander tea. Do you alter its natural structure to make the tea? Of course. Do you have to take in to consideration the chemistry of the preparation and supposed effects of the plant? Of course. So you are guilty of exactly what you are trying to slam me for.
Cyberstalker? Isn't that the claim you made when you were banned at Indiadivine.org five years ago after another "debate" involving your defense of soy?
"Oh, by the way, our mystery person is a man and, in case you don't already know, his name is James Sloane.
"Now he is emailing me off list, and perhaps others as well. I haven't responded though. For someone who is so concerned about cyberstalkers being after him, he is concerning me a bit now."
Yep, just like a real cyberstalker you are going above and beyond to dig up dirt on me since you cannot respond with facts.
Now, I realize that my friend Doc Shillington can be a bit tetchy at times, but given how you have posted and behaved in this thread and in others, I have to wonder if history is not repeating itself?
ROTFLMAO!!! This is why you should stick to what you REALLY know and not hearsay. But since you brought the nutcase up here is what really happened. On his board Shillington CLEARLY stated that he welcomed debate. Of course he could not tell the truth either. As soon as he questioned over some of his false claims about soy he got his panties all up in a bunch. So I presented the proof that his claims were wrong and he immediately banned me for it.
As far as the bogus claims that I was e-mailing people from the forum this was totally misleading. I RESPONDED to a few posters questions after they e-mailed me. I did not send any unsolicited e-mails as claimed. In fact once I was banned I DID NOT have any access to anyone's e-mail addresses from the board since you could only contact them directly through the board. So again, the only way I was able to contact these posters were in response to their e-mails to me. But hey, why present facts when you can make up stuff that you really know nothing about to trash me some more?
Funny how you claim to be friends with Shillington though and you tow are so much alike!!! Neither of you can stand to be proven wrong and make things up to fit your needs including spreading rumors against those who oppose you.
Insofar as my checking up on you, your continual defense of soy made me wonder if perhaps there was a connection out there somewhere - because it otherwise makes no sense to me.
It is simple. I am about the real facts, not made up scare tactic propaganda that has already been disproven over and over and over.....
I found none. Looks like to me that you have some good herbal combos. Now, if only you would also have good behavior and stop playing the victim and turning every disagreement into an imagined personal attack we would all be better off.
LOL!!! That is referred to in medicine as "PROJECTION"!!!
Seriously H. Learn to walk away from disagreement and operate above the fray. You are your own worst enemy here and the response you got from your post on the WM forum (quickly moved by the WM to the WM debate and Public Trash Can forums) and subsequent posts should provide you plenty of evidence of that. You have too much positive to contribute here to let your penchant for attacking at the drop of a hat and the name calling and such to erode your credibility as it is surely doing. I sincerely hope you figure that out sooner than later.
More projection. But I have looked through some of your older posts and see I am not the only victim you have attacked then blamed. You have quite a history of doing this.
For instance I love how you keep bringing up the WM's actions in what you claim is against me without telling people about how you were warned by the WM about stopping your attacks or the fact that some of the threads ogt moved because of the arguments and attacks started by you. So why do you insist on misleading people time and time again?