Your article is totally biased. The author is guilty of what he/she claims but only in reverse. For instance, they actually call a fetus a baby. The are spinning the truth in order to play the emotional card through a devious bit of word play
They use terms like "dismembering the child," when referring to the abortion process of a fetus being removed form a womb.
Let me know how many children you know "live" inside wombs.
So the very thing this article is supposed to be showing, they are actually demonstrating themselves through the use of extreme spin and over the top propaganda.
Here's a question for you. With euphemisms in mind, do you eat cows and chickens after murdering them or do you eat poultry and beef after processing them?
And yes I know your stance about placing humans on the top of some imaginary totem pole in your mind. That is also a convenient bit of self delusion in order to be able to take an animals life in order to enjoy your animal flesh addiction. Megalomania. ;-)
This kind of world play reminds me of how the elite, through their puppets, came up with the concept of "war on terrorism" just like a bunch of other wars on other things they have no intention of solving, such as illegal drugs (close to your heart) and other things. Talk about double speak. ;-)