Does anybody have any clues on this issue? I have read all kinds of things about 0 negative blood, and I think it's pretty strange that a type 0 negative woman cannot have a baby of someone who is not the same blood type. Here is some guy's synopsis, I have gotten the same information when I search...some crazy stuff...
Persistent stories have emerged for years about the evil that lurks behind the smiling facade of the royal family of England and the United Kingdom . While the theories and evidence runs the gamut, one story that remains persistent is the rumor that Queen Elizabeth II is a shape shifting superhuman creature best known as a reptilian. Her son is Prince Charles as you know.
Parallel to this story is the belief in some quarters that Type O Negative blood is indicative of reptilian, annunaki or so-called ancient astronaut ancestry on the part of those that have this rare blood type. The Universal donor - the person having this blood can donate blood to all but only receive back Type O him or herself.
Also, there is the background of the term 'blue blood' denoting royal ancestry being linked to the reptilian / dragon / annunaki / ancient astronaut bloodline due to the bluish hue of this blood due to a high copper concentration causing this coloring phenomenon.
While all of the above topics have been previously expounded by other writers, the three in combination have never been placed together to form a pattern of proof...until now.
Background of Queen of England and other Royals as blood drinking reptilians:
3. Being Rh negative means that one does not share DNA background with the Rhesus monkey or Rh and thus one is lacking that DNA or better said testing for the Rh factor leads to Negative results in the given person being examined.
A mother with Rh negative blood type will fight her Rh positive fetus' as a disease with her immune system if not treated with certain medications. An Rh positive mother will accept either type child in her womb. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-rhesus-factor.htm
4. To put it bluntly - the lack of Rh in the DNA or blood means that one having this trait does NOT SHARE DNA OR EVOLUTIONARY BACKGROUND WITH THE APES and therefore the commonly held theory of evolution is totally lacking in an explanation for this phenomenon.
The only explanation is a separate evolutionary ancestry not diluted by subhuman primates, the mutation theory is just that... a theory. No evidence for it is provided other than something was desperately needed to shore up the secular theoretical basis of existence and a critical underpinning of atheistic philosophy in particularly marxism. See: Evolution cannot explain
Rh negative factor's existence: scroll down 60% - "Are you an Rh negative blood type?
It is odd that the Queen's type is public knowledge but the Rh factor is not...IF the Rh factor could be discovered and found to be negative...that would go a long way to proving the reptilian nonhuman ancestry theory of the royals. Research into this topic is encouraged.
HOWEVER: That may not be necessary since it is public knowledge that her son -