After reading your story I'm thinking maybe the Marshall Protocol will help your husband. It's a way to kill parasites/bacteria and allow your inate immune system to work to kill cancer, etc.
Here's a video explaining it.
Here's the knowledge base. You can search lymphoma there.
Also, James on "The Truth in Medicine" says ozone cures cancer. It's expensive, BUT you can get used ones cheap on craigslist.
I hope your faith is strong. We're not our bodies and this life is just a dream. I pray for you to find peace whatever happens. Sending you both love. [[[[hugs]]]]
Only for people with autoimmune diseases caused by bacterial take over of the hormone D receptors. MP is for very ill people.
Healthy people enjoy the sun;-))
That's true about the sun being a good healer for most people, but MP is for people whose body's are overcome by bacteria, virus' and microbes that block the hormone D receptors (VDR or vitamin D receptors) and allow virus' to take over immune cells. (I call it hormone D because that's what it is.)
Cell receptors are like key holes and when certain things fit in them it's said they have an 'affinity' for that receptor. Well, bacteria has a higher affinity to those receptors than hormone D, but it doesn't fit in, so it blocks them from being turned on and becoming active by hormone D. People become flooded with "vitamin D"- a feel-good immune supressing steroid hormone.
Hormone D is a steroid hormone, so people feel better taking it, but it doesn't help them get well, it actually keeps them sick.
Marshall figured out that benicar, olmesartin, turns on the D receptors allowing transcription of 913 genes, and the immune systems to work, killing bacteria and virus', ultimately bringing the body back to homeostasis.
Trevor Marshall is often mis-identified as a biochemist, while in reality he is an electrical engineer with a somewhat shady background. See:
As one article skeptical of Marshall noted, his views that people should avoid vitamin D and avoid sunlight run counter to the overwhelming bulk of qualified opinion. None of his theories about vitamin D have been proven in vitro, and especially not in vivo. Sometimes a lone wolf who turns out to be against the overwhelming tide of opinions and evidence to the contrary is correct, but I don't think Marshall is such a wolf.
Convincing people about Vitamin D dangers is vitally important to attract people to Marshall's highly controversial protocol, and thus vitally important to the profits he and his fellow board members with vested interests in the protocol depend on. It is Marshall and his group who have authored numerous articles and papers against Vitamin D and in support of his protocol. Proper scrutiny reveals them to be self-serving articles where they cherry-picked and misrepresented studies and facts to support their premise about vitamin D and thus their protocol.
To put is succinctly, most things you see which support the Marshall protocol originate from Marshall and his group and boil down to much more salesmanship than science.
For more on Marshall, his protocol and his cohorts:
Stage IV Cancer Patient Produces Records To Show Bone Lesion Resolved in 90 Days
At this point I am tired of trying not to feel tired, you know, of all the online people who cliam they can cure cancer.
First, I hate that word "cure." People throw it around like Kleenex and for all that it is used, how many people show up with their medical records to show even bone lesion regressions? Nobody? Everybody has a cure. Nobody has a patient with medical records....? ok I think I get it!
Get this.... people die from this disease and when they come to me they are so confused and pulled in 19 different directions... They have tried Budwig, Gerson, Clark. Even when given a clear protocol in writing they start reading the disinfo. and hype and their they go, chasing a dozen rabbits afraid of their own shadow but never of the cancer that will kill them. they die fearing everything but cancer.
How do you spot hype? Well, when someone claims to have cured cancer, the type of cancer is huge. They all can manifest different pathways to generate energy. Folice acid, tyrosene kinase, hormones, not just lactic acid. So, when someone says that a product cures cancer they are usually quoting someone else or are referring to "A SINGLE CASE."
So, when someone says something "cures all cancers." It's hype, it's a theory, and it's dangerous.
It's Put UP or Shut Up!
It's also quite funny to note how much money people are making off of you poor cancer patients. You guys are pulled in so many directions and chase your tail in so many directions. I have lost so much respect for many "healers" when clients retain me and I get to watch some of you guys work. I am like the fly on the wall! I am in the shadows.
Bob Marshall told a dying Leukemia patient, a 17 y.o. female patient. (Getting blood transfusions just to stay alive another week. ) He told she was sitting on the fence and was about to basically blow it, if she didn't start following his nutritional regime. I mean she was already taking 200 pills from him. Really Bob? He represented his protocol as a cure, told her she needed to eat something different other than the coconut milk smoothies with hemp and slippery elm protein. She was getting pure organic diet with two smoothies per day.
Some type of Quinoa was it Bob? She's dead now huh? 17 year old girl Bob!!!! It was her fault eh? Larry!!! She was spending almost 1000 k/ month on minerals from you Larry! Can you give her father just a tiny rebate...maybe ten dollars even? No! Not a dime huh? It was their fault too, didn't start soon enough, didn't buy enough liquid minerals?
Larry from ESSENCE OF LIFE, quit charging so much for your damn liquid cesium.... I don't care who you are friends with anymore. I am getting sick of you! Liquid mInerals my foot! Every cancer patient should become their own distributer, buy the minerals in bulk and instead of spending 1000k a month, mix your own minerals at 60 dollars a month and not 1000 dollars!!! Really? There is nothing special about it! How do you get liquid cesium? You dissolve a 1/3 tsp in glass of water of pure cesium chloride. Now you have liquid!
As the body count grows, as I watch people die clinging to the cancer tutor protocols.... yeh.....I cry when people die swerving off the path they should be on. Hey thanks guys. Thanks so much for Susan, Lila, Betty, Edward, Melissa, and such. All were your clients, I couldn't get them to focus on actual blood and cellular oxygen they were to worried about a dozen other herbs that were miserably under dosed.
Instead of repeating other peoples claims, other peoples research, maybe you healer guys who are taking peoples lives into your hands, should finance a little research of your own and while you are all at it.... show me one damn cancer patient you have regressed, produce the records.It's time for this all to stop! No more deaths!
After seeing regressions using pro oxidant and heavy minerals that are actually dosed correctly and supported correctly I have had enough of this.
I am giving all the puported experts out there one month to produce records or I am getting a legal team together and getting all you frauds off the internet. Mickael Verentes, Vincent, and all the rest of you guys. Your time is limitted put up or shut up. People are dying on your protocols. How do I know? Hell, the moderator of cancercured is dead.... the biggest fan of cannibus in that forum is dead.... dead, dead, dead! Your whole forum is dying and there is Vincent telling people how bad ozone is. How much for your retreat? What's the matter. Can't make money off of ozone? Phd My Foot! Your days are numbered. You see I have an actual health care licensure and can actually do something about your B.S. You see! THAT'S MY JOB!
All I got to say is this.... when it comes to cancer.... know your enemy... do the research. Attacking a disease by how it breathes and eats should be pretty simple concept you would think. But not when you go online to "cure your cancer."
Here is the proof that so many others cannot produce. I have more but you get the picture.
This is the latest woman to do something not one of you can do... not Vincent, Not Webster Kerr, Not Earthclinic, not Michael Verentes, not one of you guys will remove bone lesions in 90 days like this woman did. So go away. I am tired of watching your people die!
At some point all you internet healers become a menace to mankind when your therapies take money and do very little good for your client. I have actually turned clients away with money because I felt it was too late to help them.
Overnight Cure For Cancer? Really? I am going to be sick....
This disease has taken the closest, kindest, neatest people from my life... it will take even more before we are done. All of us should be sharing and caring, not competing. But I can't learn from you healers if you don't produce a medical record.
Show me medical records of any bone regression, major metastatic regression in a late stage patient and I will post the story on my website.... I will promote you on my website.
BTW which I never do. Even this lady's story isn't on my website. So please have your "cured" clients call me with their medical records.
Bret Peirce (licensed nurse and founder)
American Cancer Advocates
sorry do not know but have a few suggestions
maybe typing things into the search engine like lymphedema alliterative health '
or Google words lymphedema herbs
might give you some help as those with this disease caused by damage or removal of the lymph nodes deal with the swelling
Maybe there is some ideas out there that might help with your thing
I know jumping on a mini tramp is supposed to help the lymph moves maybe going to a swimming pool holding on the side and jumping would move some of the lymph fluid out of there?
here's a few links
also real essential oils like young living or aura casia (cacia?) might really help you with this..I cured some lifelong skin tags and mols with it and there are some testamonies of what others used here
maybe castor oil packs will help
"Getting oxygen into cancer cells is a trick and heavy alkaline therapies do exactly that."
Oxygen does not kill cancer cells. That's an old wives' tale.
Available scientific evidence does not support claims that increasing oxygen levels in the body will harm or kill cancer cells. It is difficult to get the oxygen level around the cancer cells in the middle of a tumor higher because the blood supply tends to be poor. But there are differences in the way cancer cells use oxygen that may allow new treatments to better target cancer cells.
According to Dr. Stephen Barrett, who writes about health fraud, a researcher from the Dominican Republic claimed that his clinic had used ozone gas to cure thirteen people with cancer. An investigative news group later learned that two of the patients had died of cancer, three could not be found, two refused to be interviewed, three were alive but still had cancer, and in three cases it was not clear that the patients had actually ever had cancer.
(Typical, typical alternative cancer therapy outcomes.)
As a two time lung cancer survivor who is lung cancer free (one cancer in each lung, clinically verified before and after treatment) I have learned that there is one thing that all cancers have in common and that is that they love sugar/glucose. That's what they feed on. Not only does refined sugar turn to glucose in the stomach but so does wheat bread - whole or white, makes no never mind, rice - again white or brown, no difference, and white potatoes are even better yet in producing glucose. How do I know? I check my glucose levels after eating and have for several years. I learned this truth after having had several PET scans where they have you first refrain from eating anything for several hours, and then have you drink more than a pint of glucose solution, wait an hour and scan your entire body in 3D and in color. The glucose goes directly to the cancer cells. I've seen it, I've lived it, and I no long have lung cancer (or prostate cancer which I had twenty years ago but cured through both spiritual healing and eating raw garlic). Raw garlic is cancer's worst enemy. Also if you do just a little bit of checking around you will find that there was a spike in the incidence of cancer at the same time that soda producers went from using sugar as their sweetener and substituted high fructose corn syrup. I see that my Costco store allows you to avoid this by supplying your Coca Cola fix with the product from Mexico which still uses sugar. I avoid all of it by drinking nothing but water, or coffee or tea that I brew myself.
The Inuit people on their native diet were virtually cancer and heart disease free. They ate animal fats day after day. Their "deserts" were such things whipped whale blubber with in season berries. The Inuit were studied for many years. However, as they switched to the European diets they became just as susceptible to cancer and heart disease as the rest of us.
To avoid cancer - quit eating any refined or modern carbohydrate. Wheat and rice as food sources didn't exist 10,000 years ago and are a very modern innovation. So is the white potato.
My personal choice is the mixed vegetables that I get in bulk - frozen. It has things like green beans, bell peppers, onions, broccoli, snap peas, carrots (in limited amounts), mushrooms, some baby corn, things like that.
There is a paleo diet forum here on CZ and I used to watch it a bit but in my opinion they don't follow the real paleo diet - what we ate 10,000 or more years ago, what our bodies were designed for. But I think that you can get information on that diet through an Internet search. The point is for me to stay away from both processed carbos, and "invented" carbos. I will get lots of arguments but by following this route I've avoided having to take insulin for my diabetes for about ten years.
My very best diet for both weight and glucose control is by following "Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution: The Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars" - which is 3 carbohydrates per meal. Bernstein is a former engineer with Type I diabetes and a doctor wife who purchased for him a blood sugar tester - 30 years ago, at about $700. In those days (not that long ago) you couldn't walk into a drugstore and buy one. What he discovered was the foods that raised his blood sugar levels (all carbohydrates) and he tried to tell this to the medical community and they wouldn't listen to him. In fact they were still advocating high carbohydrate diets for diabetics (many still do). So - he went back to school and became an MD. He's the 'father' of home blood sugar level testing and his diet when you follow it, is the best one out there for both diabetics and pre diabetics but it is very difficult to follow and I fall off of it a lot. Yet when I can stay connected I not only fell better, but I lose weight as well. Bernstein is one of the oldest living Type I diabetics in the world at about 80 years old.
By the way, I watched a PBS program a couple of weeks ago and learned that the common apple is a fruit that if you grow it from seed you don't get the same apple as the one on the tree that produced it. That's why up until about the mid 19th Century almost all apples were turned into hard cider because they were all sour. Then someone finally found some sweet apples and reproduced them by grafting their branches onto standard apple stock and that's how we have all the sweet apples we have today. Delicious (both green and red), gravenstein, rome, are all very modern varieties that weren't even available to the folks who were here in 1776. The squash and pumpkins that you buy everyday in the grocery store are nowhere to be found in nature. Almost everything that you buy in the grocery store in it's "natural" state has been hybridized or maybe even genetically modified. Soybeans and corn have been - with 90% of the soybeans having been genetically modified. Soybean products are in almost everything you eat that isn't straight from the source. Also many years ago I worked in wheat harvest and wheat has been hybridized so much that at that time we couldn't use the same seed variety for more than three or four years before it would come down with disease that made it unharvestable and we would have to go to the local experimental station for the latest variety that was disease free. That time before it self destructs is now extended to eight years.
Almost all of the food we ingest bears little resemblance to what it was 2,000 years ago let alone 10,000 years ago and very few people are aware of it.
Am not questioning your sincerity am just saying there is no evidence to support the premise that oxygen kills cancer cells. It doesn't and your post has not presented any information to the contrary.
What does cause many body diseases is low oxygen levels in the blood. That is caused by such things as mouth breathing and snoring during sleep.
Low blood oxygen levels from these conditions do in fact contribute to cancer and several other diseases - yet that's never discussed here on cancer support.
"Just remember one thing bro....this isn't your disease, its not your pain...its not your nause,vomitting, waisting away...it's not your leukopenia, neutrapenia, and it's not your funeral."
You obviously haven't read my posts. I'm a three time cancer survivor. Prostate for twenty years. Lung cancer with partial loss of lung for four years, and same thing in other lung for nine months and my blood oxygen level runs from 95% to 97%.
I still haven't found a link in any of your posts that point to individual cancer cures which is what I look for.
If oxygen could cure cancer, then a hyperbaric oxygen chamber would cure cancer.
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is used in conventional treatment for decompression sickness; severe carbon monoxide poisoning; certain kinds of wounds, injuries, and skin infections; delayed radiation injury; and certain bone or brain infections. Decompression sickness, commonly known as "the bends," is an extremely painful and potentially dangerous condition that strikes deep sea divers who surface too quickly and, occasionally, miners and tunnel builders who come up too rapidly. It can also affect fighter pilots who climb very quickly.
Claims about alternative uses of HBOT include that it destroys disease-causing microorganisms, cures cancer, relieves chronic fatigue syndrome, and decreases allergy symptoms. A few supporters also claim that HBOT helps patients with AIDS, arthritis, sports injuries, multiple sclerosis, autism, stroke, cerebral palsy, senility, cirrhosis, Lyme disease, and gastrointestinal ulcers. Available scientific evidence does not support these claims. Because of that, the FDA has sent a warning letter to at least one manufacturer about promoting HBOT for unproven uses. The FDA considers oxygen to be a drug, meaning it must be prescribed by a physician or licensed health care provider to treat illnesses or health conditions.
What I will support is that maintaining a healthy oxygen level will promote the body's own defense mechanisms for not only the prevention and cure of cancer, but other disease as well. American don't know how to breathe. All you have to do is to purchase a small device that attaches to your finger which tells the oxygen level in your blood and anything below 95% is detrimental to your health. Anything under 90% is a serious problem. These devices are in the $50 range.
Leaning proper breathing will prevent and even cure disabilities more than anything else.
Once again I direct you to the instructions posted by the Webmaster at the top of this forum:
This is the Cancer ALTERNATIVES forum. People come here seeking alternatives to mainstream treatments and they have by and large rejected the mainstream approaches the same as they have rejected mainstream medicine's information, and often flat out disinformation, such as is found in the mainstream source (the American Cancer Society) you quote from.
The American Cancer Society is oriented almost entirely towards mainstream treatments. Have they ever found a single non-mainstream treatment they endorse or approve of? When reviewing various cancer alternatives most often they will describe them as spurilous or unproven and at best will say "more study is needed". The catch there is that the mainstream line is that the only medicine or treatment which is "proven" is one which has passed all the way through FDA trials, at a cost of hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars, and been approved by the FDA.
You cannot patent nature, and only something which is patentable will find the funding from the only players with enough money to play that game, namely Big Pharma. An indication of just how rigged the game is was the statement by a recent FDA head that he would not approve any drug which was not made by a major pharmaceutical company.
You are to be congratulated for successfully surving cancer thus far. Hopefully you will continue to do so and perhaps find ways to address the root cause that is enabling cancer to continue to return. Surviving cancer makes your input of your experience valuable, however it does not make you a cancer expert and neither does it make you an exception to the Webmaster's instructions to take skepticism to the debate forum.
Insofar as quoting the AICR as a source, perhaps it might be instructive to take a look at the history of the world's most profitable non-profit organization:
Certainly not what I consider an unbiased source of information when it comes to alternative treatments and not a source which most readers of this forum consider to be reliable.
Insofar as ozone therapy being unproven, perhaps you should do a bit of searching - such as searching at PubMed, where a search returns scores of hits. One such item is "Ozone therapy: A clinical review" which was published in July 2011 in the Journal of Natural Science and Biological Medicine". Excerpts from the abstract:
"Ozone therapy has been utilized and heavily studied for more than a century. Its effects are proven, consistent, safe and with minimal and preventable side effects. Medical O(3) is used to disinfect and treat disease. Mechanism of actions is by inactivation of bacteria, viruses, fungi, yeast and protozoa, stimulation of oxygen metabolism, activation of the immune system . . . Diseases treated are infected wounds, circulatory disorders, geriatric conditions, macular degeneration, viral diseases, rheumatism/arthritis, cancer, SARS and AIDS."
If you want to continue to debate the merits, or lack or merits, of ozone or oxygen treatment of cancer, please feel free to do so - but take it to the Cancer Debate forum. This thread has already become overly long with debate for a Support forum.
On a side note: my uncle is also a lung cancer survivor. His lung cancer was diagnosed at a fairly early stage and his oncologist told him that they should be able to take care of it using targeted radiation pellets. Instead, the primary tumor continued to grow, additional tumors appeared in his lungs and the cancer began to spread outside his lungs. The oncologist recommended chemotherapy but my uncle, having talked with me about alternative therapies, sent his brother-in-law to MD Anderson to find out more about oleander (MD Anderson is where the majority or oleander research has been conducted).
His brother-in-law came back with glowing reports and my uncle began a natural protocol centered around oleander (he obtained the patented medicine version from Honduras via FDA excetion rule). Within a few months the cancer growth had been halted. Then the cancer began to shrink and disappear. A year later he was cancer free with nothing but a small benign mass of scar tissue at the original tumor location left to show. About ten years later he remains cancer free.
Where in the post that you refer to do I violate TOS?
I've had and cured medically verified cancer - long before there was a "cure zone." I haven't even begun to discuss my own alternate cures that I've experienced in my own life.
Great story about your uncle. I also had an uncle who was a heavy smoker and was diagnosed with lung cancer 50 years ago at age 62. He went with the then major lung therapy which was total lung removal. He did quit smoking (not all do) and he lived another 20 years when he died at age 82.
It is what you believe that gets you through cancer more than anything else.
Three times major cancer survivor - cancer free from each one and will be 81 in a week. Why don't you like it when real cancer survivors who have used alternative treatment in the process of their own personal cure to post on the cancer alternatives support forum?
If you don't like my life/cancer experiences and the kind of cancer support that I have provided to others - then kick me off of your board.
I did not say that you violated TOS, but rather pointed you to the Webmaster's admonition at the top of the page which says to take skepticism and debate to the Cancer Debate forum. As I have told you before, I feel that you have valuable experience to share here and I have no desire to "kick you off" this forum. However, when discussion turns into debate it is best to take it to the proper debate forum.
That was good to hear about your uncle. Mine is in his nineties now and still using alternatives in preventive amounts.
Dr. Stephen Barrett is actuall a de-licensed former doctor who has been exposed as a shameless agent of Big Pharma and Big Medicine. He has virtually no credubility in these forums and is currently the subject of a lawsuit which should once and for all expose him and o him in, as he so rightly deserves.
That's a very old method of trying destroying the message that the Romans did it centuries ago. If the messenger bore bad news - they killed the messenger. That is also very typical today and is akin to the political morass that we are getting in this election year - by all sides.
If you don't like the message, criticize the message - not the messenger.
By the way, Barrett is not a "de-licensed" physician. That too is an old wives' tale. When he quit his practice he let the license lapse - just didn't renew it.
I was not attacking the messenger, but rather pointing out that the truly vile Stephen Barrett has zero credibility here. Here are just a couple of links that tell you all you need to know about Barrett:
If that isn't enough, do a Google search for "Stephen Barrett quackpot" and see the returns you get.
I will remind you once again that this is the Cancer Alternative SUPPORT forum. As is instructed at the top of the forum page, if you are skeptical about alternative treatments, take it to the Cancer Debate forum. It is OK to disagree, but you aren't likely to get much creedence when you quote sources such as the mainstream cancer organizations and especially sources like Stephen Barrett.
You have to recognize that I am a three times, medically proven, cancer survivor and what I post is what I've discovered on my healing journey which continues to this day. If being cancer free from both prostate and two time lung cancer gets me tossed, then it would be a pleasure. When other's post outright lies and I correct them is this not cancer support? There are many people chasing down a cure for their cancer and it is out there for everyone and lies in many different directions including alternative, allopathic, and spiritual.
Tony I agree that Barrett is one of the most hated human beings in the alternative field. But for what reason? If you go here
you will find that his "suspended license" is simply not true. If anyone has evidence that it is - all they have to do is to contact wiki and wiki will change it and they have done those things many times. You can also look at all the awards that he has received - from the medical community, of course.
Allopathic medicine is far from perfect as I've posted in my own cancer case before. Yet Barrett has done oodles of research into alternative medicine that nobody can refute. He was one of the first to point out the erroneous methods of one Hulda Clark. I bought into her line of bleep long before there was a cure zone. I bought one of her zappers and used it routinely. I bought her original book and found that it wasn't difficult to see that many of her bizarre claims (as in the liver fluke was behind all cancers) were simply not true. Yet to this day there is a full CZ list dedicated to her belief system. I even followed Clark's "liver" (actually gall bladder) cleanse and did it many times long before she published it. I've been into "alternative medicine" and healing since early childhood but you really have to pick and choose as you walk that route. A lot of what Clark wrote was far from original yet here on CZ she still get's credit for the flush.
Many in the alternative field have a history of discrediting valid cures and cure rates of the allopathic field.
I've read many, many books on cancer since my original bout twenty years ago and I give credence to those who have cured their own cancer themselves more than I do to those books that tell you "what" to do. I have also thrown many of those books away but there was one by a British actor who was given six months to live due to pancreatic cancer who personally investigated several different treatments for his condition. In the book his conclusion was that while allopathic medicine had it's faults, alternative medicine's cures for cancer had more than ten times the death rate than allopathic. He did cure his cancer with alternative means (I don't remember which) and was still alive last I heard.
(If you're interested in a saga of stubbornness and outright stupidity then read "Living Proof, A Medical Mutiny" by Michael Gearin-Tosh. This guy was "reader" (British term for professor) at Oxford University and was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and given six months to live. He searched the world for a cure - even talking to the dean of medicine at Oxford who told him "there are diseases that we just don't have solutions for." He went to the Gerson Institute in Texas for a while and then went home where he did coffee enemas and practiced breathing through his toes for an hour at a time, twice a day which he learned not at Gerson, but somewhere else. He cured his pancreatic cancer. That's the end of the story in the book. Check him out on the Internet and you will find that he got a tooth infection that he tried to cure the same way and ended up dying from his tooth infection. Again, go figure.)
It would be great to see more success stories posted for all kinds of alternative therapies, including ozone treatments. We do see some, and I know that the poster you address has evidently had quite a few, but we don't see a whole lot of success testimonials. It was the same way when a former member here highlly advocated ozone treatment.
I think that part of the problem is that many people are reluctant to post that they have been cured of cancer. Now, some proclaim it loudly to the skies, but others keep their success private. I know that in the cancer group I have at Yahoo, there are now over 2700 members. Yet at any given time there are not much more than 100 people who are actively posting. And, while we have success stories posted on the forum, I actually get more success stories from members sent to me by private email than are posted on the forum. I suppose that is typical of many forums - including here at CZ where I often see well over 30,000 people online but a fairly small number actually posting.
There are now well over 350 different alternative therapies for cancer. Some are much better than others and some are better for certain kinds of cancer than others. And that does not count the people who decide to cobble together a few supplements and such and count that as an alternative treatment. So long as mainstream medicine holds rigid control over the cut, poison and burn (surgery, chemo and radiation) therapies that address the symptoms of cancer instead of the root cause and so long as alternative therapies are suppressed and rejected, it will be very hard to scientifically quantify alternative success rates.
The best the cancer patient can do is do their own due diligence and thoroughly seek out information about the therapies they wish to consider and, imo, then embrace a complete anti-cancer lifestyle and protocol which includes not only some powerful cancer fighters and immune boosters, but also healthy changes in diet and nutrition, physical activity, exposure to direct and indirect sunlight, contact with nature and the soil, elimination of toxins in the body and the environment, management of stress and more.
Too often, people attempt to beat cancer with half measures and without arming themselves with as much information as possible. When the stakes of the game are your very life, then I advise you to go "all in".
As long as we continue to treat merely the symptoms of cancer with treatments that are injurious and damaging to the immune system and, in the case of chemo drugs and radiation, are most oftten themselve carcinogenic, we will continue to see more people die of their treatment than are saved by it - even though the deaths are marked down as due to "cancer".
As noted architect Frank Lloyd Wright once observed:
"The physician can bury his mistakes, but the architect can only advise his clients to plant vines."
Our guest on The Best Years in Life Radio Show for March 6th is Rose Cherrix, who has had quite the journey fighting the system for the sake of her son, who has battled Hodgkins without dangerous mainstream drugs and radiation treatments. Her family's fight led to the passage of the law known as Abraham's Law (named after her son) in 2007.
To find out more, including how to listen in and/or chat and our upcoming schedule of guests, click HERE.
Thanks for your kind words, Bret. It was a great experience meeting you as well and we enjoyed having you as a guest on our weekly radio show.
I really like and admire the work that you are doing and I think that many of us here have been blessed and are indeed a team who are helping people actually beat cancer and keep it at bay without all the pitfalls of mainstream treatments.
177 messages, 32 topics, topics per page limited to: 14, average number of messages per page: 88, 2 pages,
|Hodgkins Disease Image Gallery Last 30 Uploads|
Copyright 1999 - 2016 www.curezone.org