Yes, iodine is EXTREMELY controversial.
Prior to WWII it was not controversial at all, it was THE main medicine used for nearly everything in dosages up to 2 grams.
It was just as effective then as it is now at curing disease, not just "treating" disease as they do now with drugs.
Anti-iodine forces have lined up to fight against iodine in order to promote the vastly more profitable drugs being sold by Big Pharma.
In order to settle this dispute for yourself, you need only determine 3 questions.
1) Is iodine required by every cell in our body? Yes or No
2) If Yes, then how much and what kind?
3) WHY is iodine required by every cell in our body?
Honest answers to these questions are hard to find because they are buried under TONS of controversy. The Curezone VWT Iodine Forum has been discussing these issues for years.
You can verify my answers by searching the internet and focusing only on QUALIFIED doctors: Doctors Abraham, Brownstein, Cousens, Flechas, Derry, Davis, & Tenpenny. You can review most of their source documents Here: http://tinyurl.com/Iodine-Reading
Google "Doctor_name subject"
Here are my quick answers to save you the trouble:
1) Is iodine required by every cell in our body?
- there is an iodine receptor in every cell in our body. Unfortunately, the toxins of Fluoride, Bromide & chlorine will also be attracted into our cells to make us sickly.
2) If Yes, then how much and what kind?
Lugols Iodine was developed over 125 years ago to cure disease. It contains both iodine AND iodide which are both required in different organs:
Iodide (SSKI) is preferred by the following:
* Thyroid needs 3% prefers iodide
* Skin needs 20% and prefers iodide
* Salivary Glands prefer iodide
Iodine (Lugols) is preferred by the following:
* Muscles (650mg) and fat needs(700mg iodine) 70%
* Breast tissue needs 3-5 mg / day minimum and prefers iodine
* Prostate prefers iodine
* Stomach prefers iodine
* Ovaries prefer iodine
kidneys, spleen, liver, blood, & intestines can use either form
The entire body stores 1500 mg 1.5 gm total
* Dr Brownstein Recommended supplements = Lugols Liquid or iodoral 12 or 50 mg caps
At the curezone we have discovered that 100mg a day is optimal to start with and for maintenance. If you suffer any disease such as asthma, then up to 1 gram of SSKI is required.
3) WHY is iodine required by every cell in our body.
- Iodine is used by our immune system to kill cancer cells, defective cells, fungus, bacteria & virus. Iodine is THE BIG GUN in our immune system.
There you have it, If you don't supplement with at least 50 mg a day of Lugols or iodoral, then sooner or later you WILL become sickly. Especially if you are female.
Men don't begin suffering iodine deficiency until age 40, when prostate, ejaculation, & erectile dysfunction begins. Iodine is required by the testes to produce Testosterone. Cure erectile dysfunction with iodine!
Women suffer with hormonal problems from iodine deficiency as well. Their ovaries require iodine to produce female hormones.
I recommend that everyone read this book: The Iodine Crises: What you don't know about Iodine Can Wreck you Life. It is also available for Nook & electronic download at Amazon.Com.
Best to you,
Dr. Bakker gets it, and is very knowledgeable on iodine. Here are his comments:
Lets hear what the Trolls & Shills have to say about this message.
Best to all,
17:32 08.03.2016(updated 21:20 08.03.2016) Get short URL
The US-led coalition operating in Syria is playing a massive game of dress-up in the country, where “its immense but now stranded terrorist hordes” change their banners back and forth from Daesh to the so-called Free Syrian Army, seeking protection within the terms of the ceasefire, according to a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher.
Free Syrian Army fighters clean their weapons and check ammunition at their base on the outskirts of Aleppo, Syria.
© AP Photo/ Khalil Hamra
US-backed Proxies Use Ceasefire in Syria to 'Regroup, Rearm and Prepare'
The Syrian conflict portrayed by the US-led coalition as a civil war within the country is in fact a clear invasion from outside Tony Cartalucci writes in his article for the New Eastern Outlook website.
The world has realized that there has never been a so-called Free Syrian Army (FSA) operating on Syrian soil. The fighters were actually western-backed “terrorist hordes,” flowing into the country as one would expect amid an invasion, not a “civil war,” he says.
“While the West’s military campaigns over and upon Syrian soil claimed to be taking on the so-called “Islamic State” (ISIS) or Daesh, it was clear that nothing was being done about cutting off the obvious supply corridors sustaining Daesh's ability to fight.
“In other words, the US and its “coalition’s” war on ISIS was feigned. No genuine military campaign would ever be fought on the front lines while neglecting the enemy’s logistical lifelines – especially when those lifelines led from NATO territory,” he states.
People walk past the US State Department building July 6, 2011 in Washington, DC
© AFP 2016/ Karen BLEIER
US State Department Says Working ‘Constructively’ With Russia on Syria
It wasn’t until Russia’s intervention on behalf of the Syrian government, he adds, when these corridors were targeted and disrupted – thus fully exposing the gambit for all the world to see.
“Not surprisingly, as soon as this began, it had an immediate effect on the West’s proxy forces across the country. Since then, Russian-backed Syrian forces have incrementally begun sealing off Syria’s borders, isolating stranded terrorist factions within the interior of the country, and retaking territory as these forces atrophy and dissipate.”
As the global public becomes increasingly aware of this “glaring point of logic,” the researcher explains, “it appears that the West is now attempting to cynically leverage it, while simultaneously rescuing thousands of trapped terrorist mercenaries facing encirclement and destruction in the closing phases of the Syrian conflict.
The author provides as an example a sudden appearance of the “New Syrian Army,” a moniker for the discredited FSA, on the Iraqi-Syrian border, “cutting off” ISIS supply lines leading back and forth between the two countries.
Syria Democratic Forces and Free Syrian Army fighters gesture on the back of pick-up trucks in a village on the outskirts of al-Shadadi town, Hasaka countryside, Syria
© REUTERS/ Rodi Said
Syrian Kurds Urge US, Russia to Force Free Syrian Army to Peace
He further questions why such border interdiction operations haven’t been done before, and in fact, why these “rebels” who are admittedly harbored, trained, funded, and armed in Jordan and Turkey to begin with, didn’t first begin by securing Syria’s borders to prevent Daesh from entering the country in precisely the same areas “rebels” are supposedly operating?
His answer is very simple: the West had no intention of stopping Daesh.
“In fact, Daesh are the “rebels” and the “rebels” are Daesh. Their “taking” of the Syrian-Iraqi border is superficial at best. The weapons, cash, and fighters will still flow, just as they do past NATO forces along the Turkish-Syrian border. The only difference is that now these terrorists will be flying the “FSA” flag, lending them protection amid a ceasefire agreed to in good faith by the Syrian government and its allies.”
Taking full advantage of the ceasefire, the “FSA” is now suddenly appearing as if rising from the dead, everywhere Daesh and Al Qaeda have dominated for years, he says.
“It appears that – having exhausted all other options – the West has decided to change as many of those black banners back to the “rebel” green, white, and black (the colors of the Free Syrian Army) as possible, before the conflict draws to a close, giving the West the most favorable position achievable ahead of “peace talks.”
During early victories against the West’s proxy forces, Al Qaeda and Daesh militants would dress as women to flee the battlefield. Now, they are dressing up as the otherwise nonexistent “FSA,” the author concludes.http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160308/1035964151/syria-terrorists-dressup.html
>- You assume and claim that it is important but you have not provided any objective proof that it is.
NO, I have given the proof in the form of this picture.
It is not just the green algae that is killed. The water, after zapping, is not cloudy, it is very clear. Under microscopic examination no living microbes were found. Almost all microbes have been killed if not all. As I have said before, a zapper based on the 555 has never been shown to be able to do this. A frequency generator has never been shown to be able to do this.
That is all the proof that most sensible customers need. The second thing that they need is to know that if our product does not do what they want it to do, they can get a refund. See our refund policy.
>- spread unjustified claims
Our claims are justified. Every claim that we have made is fair and valid.
On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan award compensation to a boy for vaccine-induced autism. (See the Italian document here.) A childhood vaccine against six childhood diseases caused the boy’s permanent autism and brain damage.
While the Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, the U.S. press has been silent.
Like the U.S., Italy has a national vaccine injury compensation program to give some financial support to those people who are injured by compulsory and recommended vaccinations. The Italian infant plaintiff received three doses of GlaxoSmithKline’s Infanrix Hexa, a hexavalent vaccine administered in the first year of life. These doses occurred from March to October 2006. The vaccine is to protect children from polio, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, pertussis and Haemophilus influenza type B. In addition to these antigens, however, the vaccine then contained thimerosal, the mercury-containing preservative, aluminum, an adjuvant, as well as other toxic ingredients. The child regressed into autism shortly after receiving the three doses.
When the parents presented their claim for compensation first to the Ministry of Health, as they were required to do, the Ministry rejected it. Therefore, the family sued the Ministry in a court of general jurisdiction, an option which does not exist in the same form in the U.S.
Based on expert medical testimony, the court concluded that the child more likely than not suffered autism and brain damage because of the neurotoxic mercury, aluminum and his particular susceptibility from a genetic mutation. The Court also noted that Infanrix Hexa contained thimerosal, now banned in Italy because of its neurotoxicity, “in concentrations greatly exceeding the maximum recommended levels for infants weighing only a few kilograms.”
Presiding Judge Nicola Di Leo considered another piece of damning evidence: a 1271-page confidential GlaxoSmithKline report (now available on the Internet). This industry document provided ample evidence of adverse events from the vaccine, including five known cases of autism resulting from the vaccine’s administration during its clinical trials (see table at page 626, excerpt below).
As in many other developed countries, government, not industry, compensates families in the event of vaccine injury. Thus GSK’s apparent lack of concern for the vaccine’s adverse effects is notable and perhaps not surprising.
In the final assessment, the report states that:
“[t]he benefit/risk profile of Infanrix hexa continues to be favourable,” despite GSK’s acknowledgement that the vaccine causes side effects including “anaemia haemolytic autoimmune,thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopenic purpura, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, haemolytic anemia, cyanosis, injection site nodule, abcess and injection site abscess, Kawasaki’s disease, important neurological events (including encephalitis and encephalopathy), Henoch-Schonlein purpura, petechiae, purpura, haematochezia, allergic reactions (including anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions),” and death (see page 9).
The Milan decision is sober, informed and well-reasoned. The Ministry of Health has stated that it has appealed the Court’s decision, but that appeal will likely take several years, and its outcome is uncertain.
Two years earlier, on May 23, 2012, Judge Lucio Ardigo of an Italian court in Rimini presided over a similar judgment, finding that a different vaccine, the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine (MMR), had caused a child’s autism. As in the Milan case, the Ministry of Health’s compensation program had denied compensation to the family, yet after a presentation of medical evidence, a court granted compensation. There, too, the Italian press covered the story; the U.S. press did not.
In that case, a 15-month old boy received his MMR vaccine on March 26, 2004. He then immediately developed bowel and eating problems and received an autism diagnosis with cognitive delay within a year. The court found that the boy had “been damaged by irreversible complications due to vaccination (with trivalent MMR).” The decision flew in the face of the conventional mainstream medical wisdom that an MMR-autism link has been “debunked.”
Both these Italian court decisions break new ground in the roiling debate over vaccines and autism. These courts, like all courts, are intended to function as impartial, unbiased decision makers.
The courts’ decisions are striking because they not only find a vaccine-autism causal link, but they also overrule the decisions of Italy’s Ministry of Health. And taken together, the court decisions found that both the MMR and a hexavalent thimerosal- and aluminum-containing vaccine can trigger autism.
These court decisions flatly contradict the decisions from the so-called U.S. vaccine court, the Court of Federal Claim’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. There, from 2007 to 2010, in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding, three decision makers, called Special Masters, found that vaccines did not cause autism in any of the six test cases, and one Special Master even went so far as to compare the theory of vaccine-induced autism to Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland.
The Italian court decisions contrast starkly with these U.S. cases based on similar claims.
Read the full story at Age of Autism.
>In place of turpentine, you can substitute other known products that have an anti-fungal effect, but also have even stronger antibacterial effects – MMS , Bacillus subtilis, hydrogen peroxide, iodine, etc. Each of these will impact the entire ecosystem and create imbalances that may be lifelong. Many of these have wider antimicrobial effects than antibiotics.<
>Antibiotics will wipe out all of the bacteria in the body within a period of 5 to 7 days. Some of the species will never return leading to permanent population shifts that can remain for a lifetime unless corrected. These population shifts can form the foundation for diseases and conditions that follow. Systemic fungal candida is created by the imbalances caused by antibiotics. Without the bacteria present, and the massive shifts within this ecosystem, fungal candida will flourish and subsequently play a role in determining which bacteria re-establish themselves and to what degree that is possible.<
>Choose an approach that doesn’t “kill” [Grizz mentions MELT??]candida. Anything that does will also kill the yeast form and create additional imbalances. Some researchers are now looking at candida’s ability to alkalize the body. Killing candida could lead to increased acidity in the tissues.<
There is no mention of any co supplements in the article. In my opinion, it is doubtful that anything can stop the effects of such a powerful antifungal such as iodine.
I just left a message for Dr. Bakker. I hope he gets more interested in my research. We'll see if he responds,
I left him a 2nd message with this link to Vitamin D3 curing Candida, and it only took about 1 hour before he deleted it, without a comment,
The big problem is that all of my research will adversely impact the sale of his own products. So I am not expecting him to do much more than to delete or ignore my messages, In any event, his website contains a lot of valuable information, so I will continue to promote him,
You extrapolate a lot from a simple exercise in logic.
I will not get in there. But to say, obviously things must be in balance. What do you think Acid/Alkaline pH Balance means?
Dr. Guy formulated a theory that most disease conditions, acute infections, anemias, metabolic disturbances and malignant cell overgrowths are the direct results of changes in the hydrogen-ion content of the lymph of the body which produces blockage of the lymph channels. In his studies of the growth of corn and other forms of vegetable life, he had been able to demonstrate that the absence of sufficient potassium salts in the soil would result in stunted growth, and evidence of precipitation of minute particles of iron and other substances in the stalks. When potassium was added, the growth proceeded normally; when dilute hydrochloric acid was also added, the growth was further stimulated.
He studied the lymph of a large number of patients suffering from carcinoma, and found that these cases showed a hydrogen-ion much higher than normal individuals. He also found that by administering the salts of potassium in combination with dilute hydrochloric acid, either orally or by the intravenous route, these patients made remarkable clinical improvement, and the hydrogen-ion content of their lymph became normal.
The publication of his series of articles in THE MEDICAL WORLD was followed by a large number of case reports by practicing physicians who greeted the new therapeutic procedure with great enthusiasm. Dr. Guy published his first book on this subject in 1934, and a revision in 1935.
Have a look at the "FAO Hveragerthi" thread in the Candida Forum and ignore this wind up merchant ;-)
We appreciate yourknowledge I wouldnt bite to this guy or he'll keep winding you up!
Actually I do not usually mind unless he just gets totally out of conTROLL.