if you read all of a given document of his ( in this case a whopping 82 page exposé ) , you now have a good idea of how he thinks and feels his way through analyzing or deconstructing other people's information particularly when it comes to unwinding partial truths and apparent outright lies "big news", if he didn't cover a detail, like the baby, he either didn't consider it a big deal or perhaps did not gain enough insight to warrant mention.
Somewhere in all of this is an idea that "they" only perpetrate gross injustice upon we the little people AFTER they have made it known that they admit/ acknowledge the capability to do ____ whatever it us they've been able to do for 50 years or so before they drop clues, names or other hints by way of pop culture / movies / TV and, I guess, by way of "wikileaks" ..... whether or not a given person still has enough functioning gray matter to recognize said dropped clue, name, hint, Perhaps this serves their code of ethics or other idea ( or soothes their conscience, assuming they/collevtively it, have a conscience) for fair play ..... caveat emptor or the like.
I unplugged ( literal) from the web and PCs over 5 years ago, have been using IPad exclusively since then, makes it easy to browse but since I do not follow the mac heard for loading all kinds of appls to make IPad more like a PC, the downside is the lack of ease for saving my own copy of text/htm file, docs, etc. ..... oh well ..... photo/vid files being an exception but as you should be able to guess by now, neither do I usually follow the herd on saving or posting vids, pics and such .... but when you say they will throw in jail via backdoor possession of banned files, as an example, do you mean the kind alleged to be found on A Weiner's laptop last year which the FBI and NYPD are said to have confirmed in spades ? .... still waiting for that prosecution to happen.