>Yes in the beginning for about 6 months I had blurry vision with alot of floaters.
IIRC suddenly having a lot of floaters can be a sign of uveitis.
How long did you have blurry vision after you stopped taking the medication? Did you have visual snow? Visual snow looks like a low resolution video pixalated with the dots moving. http://visualsnowsyndrome.com/ some times visual snow can be confused with and written as blurry vision.
I also had strong color saturation to the point of not being able to see surfaces. Luckily a lot of the color saturation issues have improved. I still have major vision problems though. I will write more in a separate post later.
Its been two and a half months since I took one dose of ivermectin.
God tells us about the human mind and the proper attitudes necessary for good, peaceful and happy living (look at all verses, does He not expose the inner mind?).....take notice of all the symbolic allegory of scripture).
...does He not intend that we are restored to natural man as was Adam before the fall?
...it is as though scripture is nothing more than THE HANDBOOK OF NATURE and the dark forces of satan (secret societies) have simply changed the language used by making it all PROPRIETARY (non-generic) so that we became CONFUSED about its meaning/purpose.
Many people have learned to be a UNIT of society/this world.
Albendazole binds the tublin in nematode guts. Is more effective on softer nematodes.
Albendazole 220/D helps protect organs. It tends to put nematodes to stay near to the nest. Albendazole 330/D can kill red worms, meaning it is powerful on certain stages or sizes. I got threadworms in left ear. I found that 3 weeks of 330mg to 440mg at 6 pm, removed the worm.
I use liquid ALB, in yogurt, with teaspoon of natural piperazine.
Xanthoparmelia Scabrosa is a nitrogen catalyst, helps remove worm pee in gut. I use 12:1 extract strength powder, mixes well in yogurt. Teaspoon is about 5 to 7 cc of powder.
Albendazole helps penitration of nitrogen based antiparasitic meds.
Albendazole works well with many meds, to increase their effectiveness. It is a co-factor, or multiplier of strength med.
In that it is a broad spectrum binder of Tublin, it disturbs parasite GI processing of some Carbs.
The human body has many holes in its armor, when it comes to parasites. Mucus inflammation causes many problems with immune system, D-Camphor molecules quiet down pain at low doses, carefully measured med.
Albendazole and Invermectin are very harmful to eggs, cysts, granulomas, and many stages of nematodes. White worm infections and red worm infections can be calmed with daily threshold dose of ALB 2 cc of 116mg/ml liquid.
Freshness date is marked on the bottle to determine oxidation rate of medicine liquid form is ideal for storage.
Daily typical doses of albendazole are 3 to 4 cc of liquid, 330 - 440mg dose. Typically done at 6 pm for nocturnal worms, albendazole is a significant drain on large white worm species at a threshold or typical dosing level. Albendazole also works on threadworms, redworms, and several flatworm species.
Albendazole is not toxic or harmful when dosed at the lowest possible level.
Albendazole kills few worms directly, so it is a poor specificity suppression agent, not a parasite killer.
Albendazole is a reversible medication, meaning it has a limited lifetime of activity, so to get an effect you have to take a dose daily.
Albendazole can make other antiparasitics stronger, for example:
Albendazole can make natural antiparasitics Papaya Seed, Papaya Oil.
DMSO makes things stronger, like Albendazole, teaspoon can be put on skin before a shower to get sulfur solvent to the body areas.membranes
DMSO makes Albendazole stronger.action
MSM 1000 and Magnesium Sulfate Dr Clark, make Albendazole action more membrane friendly.
Papaya Seed oil on skin after a shower provides skin protection to threadworm strongyloides stages.
Cloves make Albendazole more effective.detox Cloves Dr Clark.
BOOM: PERFECT FACT CHECK ON PUERTO RICO!
55 MPH WINDS CONFIRMED BY THE BEUFORT SCALE.
THIS Wall street journal report says the damage in the photo below was caused by "25 foot waves".
OK, NOW LOOK AT THE BEUFORT SCALE. WHAT WIND MAKES 25 FOOT WAVES? ANSWER: Winds between 47 and 54 MPH. OK; SO NOW, LOOK AT MY HURRICANE WIND MEASUREMENTS AGAIN, WHAT ARE THE WIND SPEEDS??!!?? HA HA HA, NAILED IT!!!!
Yeah, but 54 mph winds would never peel a roof back, like what is in that photo, RIGHT? Guess again, here is a close up of how poorly constructed the homes are in Puerto Rico! This lived, and it was right on the beach getting the full blast!
I was wrong about one thing though: There are a few destroyed homes and flipped cars in Puerto Rico, because "25 foot waves" were able to reach them. That's not the same as having the wind do it, but I said nothing would be destroyed so I have to correct that because I did not think about wave damage.
The construction in Puerto Rico is so poor it would never be allowed in mainland America, and the photo above proves it. 155 mph winds? MY ***, please subtract 100 from that, and we will have a match both for what happened to such poor construction on the ground, and the Beufort scale.
The wave heights, when contrasted with the Beufort scale, prove what the winds were with a totally objective reference. There is no way NOAA or the scamming MSM will ever overcome what they have reported about wave heights. Once they said that, they provided a reference that cannot be refuted. They are irrevocably busted by the Beufort scale, category 1/tropical storm CONFIRMED. Keep in mind that no admissions will be made, because there is a phoney global warming agenda to uphold, and for that agenda to succeed they need their "super storms". Also keep in mind that Drudge is nothing but a headline parrot who posts bullshit frequently because of that so his sensational headlines are meaningless.
As a rebuttal, before it is needed
It will obviously be argued that my wind samples of Maria on Puerto Rico are irrelevant, because at the time they were taken, Maria was weakened by the mountains. But that won't work because:
During the weather mod portion of the report, where I reported clear evidence of weather mod pumping up Maria, I posted a capture of Maria just as it was making landfall. That capture proves the winds were not over 85 mph (as I stated) because the wind map starts to turn purple after that. Since the capture has only wind speeds up to whatever red will cover, it means these winds were between 59 and 85 mph but there is no way to know exactly what they were because I was only interested in showing the weather mod in progress and not the actual wind speed so I did not sample the wind. Here is that capture that proves beyond a doubt the 155 mph winds were B.S. because the map progresses all the way through purple to white before 155 mph is reached. If it is all red, it is category 1 or less.
Also to repeat yesterday, Magic Box wrote and said the square artefacts were due to the sampling. However, with the exact same sampling, Jose to the North had no artefacts (this is all posted below)
In the aftermath of the devastation wrought by Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma, and Hurricane Jose brewing in the Atlantic, many people are looking for answers as to the increasingly volatile weather being witnessed.
And while climate change is one potential cause, there are other lesser known activities that could potentially be playing a role in the manifestation of these weather anomalies.
While weather modification and geo-engineering are still somewhat taboo subjects to the mainstream, often considered to be in the realm of Conspiracy theory, there is a significant body of academic research and Science that confirms that these technologies not only exist but are being operationalized.
No, the Free Thought Project is not claiming the government, nor anyone else is making hurricanes or actively controlling the weather. We are only presenting this information because it exists and people should be aware that it exists.
In a segment aired on CBS in 2013, respected scientist Dr. Michio Kaku, a physics professor at City College of New York, discussed – with Charlie Rose and Norah O’Donnell – the Science of weather manipulation.
During the interview Kaku, in discussing the experiments with weather modification notes that “We’re shooting trillion watt lasers into the sky,” referencing the use of lasers to induce changes to naturally occurring weather phenomena.
Later in the conversation, Kaku briefly touches on the history of weather modification that has been carried out for decades by the government – with the CBS hosts quickly interrupting him to note these programs were only “alleged.”
Of course, these hosts must be ignorant of the declassified history of “Operation Popeye,” which was a weather manipulation program enacted during the Vietnam War as a means of creating ongoing monsoon conditions in an effort to impeded the Viet Cong’s mobility in the region.
This is no “conspiracy theory.”
In fact, research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences specifically notes that laser beams create plasma channels in air, which in turn, cause ice to form.
READ MORE: Conspiracy Theory No More, Harvard Reveals Big Oil-Approved 'Stratospheric Injection' Geoengineering
Professor Jean-Pierre Wolf and Dr. Jerome Kasparian, both biophotonics experts at the University of Geneva, actually organized a conference at the World Meteorological Organization to discuss how powerful laser pulses can be used to generate changes in the atmosphere that influence the weather.
Wolf and Kasparian said:
“Under the conditions of a typical storm cloud, in which ice and supercooled water coexist, no direct influence of the plasma channels on ice formation or precipitation processes could be detected.
“Under conditions typical for thin cirrus ice clouds, however, the plasma channels induced a surprisingly strong effect of ice multiplication.
“Within a few minutes, the laser action led to a strong enhancement of the total ice particle number density in the chamber by up to a factor of 100, even though only a 10−9 fraction of the chamber volume was exposed to the plasma channels.
“The newly formed ice particles quickly reduced the water vapour pressure to ice saturation, thereby increasing the cloud optical thickness by up to three orders of magnitude.”
Adding credence to the idea of scientists using geo-engineering technology to manipulate the weather, according to the MIT Technology Review:
A pair of Harvard climate scientists are preparing small-scale atmospheric experiments that could offer insights into the feasibility and risks of deliberately altering the climate to ease global warming.
They would be among the earliest official geoengineering-related experiments conducted outside of a controlled laboratory or computer model, underscoring the growing sense of urgency among scientists to begin seriously studying the possibility as the threat of climate change mounts.
Sometime next year, Harvard professors David Keith and Frank Keutsch hope to launch a high-altitude balloon, tethered to a gondola equipped with propellers and sensors, from a site in Tucson, Arizona. After initial engineering tests, the “StratoCruiser” would spray a fine mist of materials such as sulfur dioxide, alumina, or calcium carbonate into the stratosphere. The sensors would then measure the reflectivity of the particles, the degree to which they disperse or coalesce, and the way they interact with other compounds in the atmosphere.
Another top American climate researcher – Professor Alan Robock from Rutgers – says that the CIA is looking into weather modification as a form of warfare.
READ MORE: WATCH: Police Turn Away Homeless People at Hurricane Shelters—Because They're Homeless
As reported in The Independent:
A senior American climate scientist has spoken of the fear he experienced when US intelligence services apparently asked him about the possibility of weaponising the weather as a major report on geo-engineering is to be published this week.
Professor Alan Robock stated that three years ago, two men claiming to be from the CIA had called him to ask whether experts would be able to tell if hostile forces had begun manipulating the US’s weather, though he suspected the purpose of the call was to find out if American forces could meddle with other countries’ climates instead.
During a debate on the use of geo-engineering to combat climate change, at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Jose, California, Prof Robock said: “I got a phone call from two men who said we work as consultants for the CIA and we’d like to know if some other country was controlling our climate, would we know about it?
“I told them, after thinking a little bit, that we probably would because if you put enough material in the atmosphere to reflect sunlight we would be able to detect it and see the equipment that was putting it up there.
“At the same time I thought they were probably also interested in if we could control somebody else’s climate, could they detect it?”
Professor Robock, who has investigated the potential risks and benefits of using stratospheric particles to simulate the climate-changing effects of volcanic eruptions, said he felt “scared” when the approach was made.
“I’d learned of lots of other things the CIA had done that haven’t followed the rules and I thought that wasn’t how I wanted my tax money spent. I think this research has to be in the open and international so there isn’t any question of it being used for hostile purposes.”
Professor Robock’s concerns come as a major report on geo-engineering is to be published this week by the US National Academy of Sciences. Among the report’s list of sponsors is the “US intelligence community”, which includes Nasa, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the US Department of Energy.
The professor alleges that the CIA told a colleague of his that it wanted to fund the report, but claimed that it did not want this fact to be too obvious – he added that the CIA is “a major funder” of the report which “makes me really worried about who is going to be in control”.
He claimed the US government had a proven history of using the weather in a hostile way, citing the action of seeding clouds during the Vietnam War to muddy the Ho Chi Minh foot-trail and attempt to cut it off, as it was used as a supply route but the north Vietnamese.
He claimed the CIA had also seeded clouds over Cuba “to make it rain and ruin the Sugar harvest”.
While certain powerful constituencies are well aware of the extremely powerful forces that can be unleased through weather modification technology, these same groups would like to keep the general public unaware of these technologies and programs.
READ MORE: Scientists Now Testing 'Vaccine' to 'Inoculate' People Against Climate Change Denial
Whether these recent weather phenomena may, or may not, have anything to do with weather manipulation technology, make no mistake that weather modification is a real and practiced science – and is no Conspiracy theory.
Listen to Dr. Michio Kaku briefly explain the reality of scientific weather manipulation below:
I think the red rolled up skins looking ones could be liver flukes.
Black stool and your description of how you feel sounds like lots of die off toxins. Charcoal, spirulina, dodder seed, enemas and Epsom SaltLiver Flushes should be in place. Also monitor your PH and keep on the baking soda+msm in distilled water.
(The Best Years in Life) Millions of people live with chronic pain and autoimmune disease. Some have had the benefit of a diagnosis, while others are still dragging themselves from doctor to doctor trying to find answers. If you fall into the latter category, you’re not alone. Read More.