(Natural News) Janet Napolitano, the former Homeland Security Secretary made infamous for announcing the “see something, say something” campaign that would now be utterly despised by the Left, was nearly killed by an overdose of cancer medications, reports Radar Online.
Described as a “terrifying event,” Radar Online reports that “Napolitano was unconscious for hours before a staffer discovered her body — and that an accidental overdose of her cancer medications was the culprit.”
Napolitano was apparently discovered in an unconscious state by a friend who called paramedics. “The doctors were worried about brain damage,” insiders told Radar Online, which also reports, “the sherriff’s office attorney for Oakland, California, told Radar that it was cancer drugs and NOT Napolitano’s illness itself that led to her hospitalization.”
Cancer medications are known for being especially toxic and can cause brain damage, liver damage and kidney damage. “Chemo brain” is a common side effect of chemotherapy treatment, and it is characterized by an inability to focus, loss of memory and loss of cognitive function. There’s little doubt that modern cancer “treatments” actually kill more people than cancer itself. (Yet their death certificates always state they were killed by cancer, not by chemotherapy or radiation.) Learn more about the toxic cancer industry at CancerScams.com.
According to Radar Online, Napolitano was diagnosed with cancer last year and has been undergoing “treatment” with toxic chemotherapy drugs for the last five months. Her cancer treatment history demonstrates yet again how the cancer industry is a total failure that never really prevents or treats cancer. “Napolitano had her right breast removed in 2000 after being diagnosed with cancer. Four years later, she had surgery to remove her right ovary and an ovarian cyst,” reports Radar Online.
Much of the cancer industry is a criminal racket. Just last year, a prominent oncologist in the Detroit area was sent to prison for falsely diagnosing African-American patients with cancer so he could profit from the chemotherapy “treatment” they didn’t need. Thousands of patients were ultimately subjected to toxic chemicals that damaged them for life. (RELATED: Read more stories about the horrors of oncology at Oncology.news)
What’s especially sad and ironic in all this is that Janet Napolitano, an obedient minion of the tyrannical police state establishment, is being chemically murdered by the tyrannical medical establishment… and she doesn’t even know it.
While we hope Napolitano somehow achieves a speedy recovery, the laws of cause and effect betray the far more certain outcome that she will be killed by the very cancer “treatments” her ignorant doctors have told her are saving her life. Sadly, Napolitano looks determined to become yet another victim of the very same exploitative system of government lies she once proliferated in exchange for a paycheck. Remember: While she was telling America that patriots were terrorists, the cancer industry was telling America that there’s “no such thing as an anti-cancer food, nutrient or supplement.”
It turns out that believing establishment lies about cancer can literally cost you your life. Why are we not surprised she’s now in charge of California’s university education system that’s also steeped in a total disconnect from reality?
It turns out you really do reap what you sow.
This should nail down the reason that no matter what doctor, or dentist, it behooves you to get a second opinion regardless.
Money well spent.
My name is actually Costas, though you should drop the preceding 'actually'.
Unfortunately, it lends itself to an obvious term of abuse (Costa$$) that one rabid zealot has barely missed an opportunity to exploit. For a grown (or should that be groan?) man whose wife has cancer, his conduct has been unbelievably puerile. And yes, you're quite right of course. It is very reminiscent of a form of playground bullying. But this time they picked on the wrong guy with whom to play that game. I am not so easily intimidated, and I give as good as I get without resorting to outright abuse as far as that is humanly possible.
But thanks for the compliment, and yes, normal service will be resumed asap. I'm unable to post at the moment coz I'm preparing for a classical guitar recital that I'm due to give in a few days. I also have a 'to do' list that just keeps growing, including advising a breast cancer sufferer who is on chemo and has not responded to some natural protocols. Helping her is a lot more important to me than doing battle with a bunch of die-hard deluded SBM/EBM advocates.
As for which protocols I would recommend, I would not rely on any single protocol to cure my cancer. I do not believe in the 'magic bullet' theory when it comes to finding a cure for cancer. Rather, I believe cancer is a systemic manifestation that requires a holistic approach that should include cutting out all refined carbs, fasting, the ketogenic diet, an anti-cancer diet that includes all the foods, vits & minerals recommended for example by K Scott-Mumby in his book (Cancer Research Secrets), exercise, sound sleep, massage and skin scrubbing, etc etc.
To this base-level maintenance regimen I would also add 2 or 3 major compatible protocols including, for example, Iodine, IV vit. C where possible (or massive oral doses where not), and Cesium Chloride high pH therapy - though this requires expert supervision coz of the risk of potassium depletion. And I wouldn't necessarily even stop there. I don't believe in taking hostages when it comes to cancer, so I would add maybe another 3 or 4 subsidiary protocols including apricot pits, essential oils, Essiac Tea, etc.
If you accuse me of 'hedging my bets', I would plead guilty as charged. It would be great to know which of these protocols actually delivered the coup de gras to the cancer, but I believe it is much more important to deal this monster its quietus by any means necessary, including the scatter-gun approach if that's what it takes. If your cancer is slow growing and non-aggressive, you could try the magic bullet approach with something like Protocel, but again I would be tempted to supplement that with a couple of compatible protocols as recommended by Pierce (Outsmart Your Cancer).
There is much more I could say, but as usual time is against me. There are many sites that give excellent advice, including Cancer Tutor and TTAC, and you could do a lot worst than to start by reading around these if you want more info on this subject. Not forgetting the numerous testimonials & advice you can find on the cancer forums here as well.
Having said all that, just one word of caution. There is no such thing as a guaranteed cure for cancer. Some sufferers have had their immune systems, vital organs, etc. so thoroughly trashed by conventional treatments that no amount of natural remedies can help them. Cachexia is all they have left, and coming back from that is nothing short of a minor miracle.
I take it everyone who visits these forums is aware that a free viewing of the TTAC docu-series is about to kick off again?
I believe this is the link:
but I'll check it to make sure, and re-post if I've got it wrong. Part One is about to air.
Few of us have the luxury of the spare time needed to view the entire series, but if you can, please beg, borrow, or steal the time if you've never seen this series before. It's well worth anybody's time, even the President's.
In fact, especially the President's. If he knew the truth, at least there might be a chance he'd put an end to this insanity. Oh, that's right, he can't. They control him too.
I couldn't agree more with this bloke:
Marian (March 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM) – You’d better believe it chuck. You obviously haven’t seen TTAC – A Global Quest. I don’t recall the episode in question, or the name of the guy concerned, but his personal testimony was more than credible, and it was all he could do to hold back the tears while he recounted the whole sorry episode in horrific blow-by-blow detail. The only thing that saved him from completely breaking down in front of camera was regular breaks to sip from an over-sized paper cup of what appeared to be some kinda soda pop. Neat Scotch might have served him better under the circumstances considering the level of distress in evidence as he recounted his story, but I guess the deleterious effects of a stronger drink might have rendered him unintelligible by the end of his ‘piece to camera’.
But seriously, I don’t think Ty would have stooped so low as to fabricate such a story simply to prove a point, and if it was all faked, the guy deserves an Oscar in any event. I don’t recall all the details of his experience of the enforcement wing of big pharma, but if memory serves, the story revolves around his daughter’s forcible treatment at the hands of an oppressive state bureaucracy, which included (inter alia) the threat of her abduction if he resisted their ‘intervention’. He could not ignore their threats, which of course were backed by the force of law. Thankfully, his daughter survived the trauma of her forcible poisoning by them thanks to the timely administration of some alternative protocols. But for the detox benefits afforded her by these protocols, she could well have ended up as just another statistic of ‘the system’.
If the poor girl had died at the hands of these butchers, do you seriously imagine for one moment that it would occasion much more than a raised eyebrow, or that a single person would be held accountable for her death? Because if you do, then you should consider the possibility that it might be you who is in denial here. But if she died in a Mexican hospital that practiced any of the many alternative treatments, just watch the state apparatus go into overdrive as soon as her body was repatriated in an attempt to prosecute her parents on the grounds of child neglect. Please, this is rank hypocrisy on a monumental scale, and it must not be allowed to stand. The death toll by now from these so-called ‘treatments’ must number in the hundreds of millions at least. How many more must die before this insanity is brought to an end?
What an articulate & intelligent response to a cynical post. If you want to see more of the discussion, you'll find it here:
Yeah, ok, you got me. Caught red-handed blowing my own trumpet again. I need #461 to cut me back down to size again. Where are you chuck? We missed you.
Hey, no apology necessary, really. I've done it myself loadsa times. I know how hard it can be to stay on topic, especially when most of us have our own furrows to plough. The big pharma scam is one of those furrows for me. I still don't get why millions of cancer patients around the world allow themselves to be poisoned by this quackery. The white coat still seems to exert a power that is out of all proportion to the reality of what it can actually achieve.
I'm not sure I'd call it an expose, in the sense that it doesn't reveal anything new. I would say it's more an analysis of how we got to this state. It attempts to answer the question put to me by a family friend, namely, why big pharma isn't interested in natural cures. But I will post it soon. It's almost done - just temporarily delayed while I sort out a cooling system problem with the car. Best guess, around 8-10 days.
(NaturalNews) Monolithic science experiments are frequently being carried out on humans and the environment through the use of agro-chemicals and genetically modified seeds. Every time a new agro-chemical is invented, stronger than the one before it, the hypothesis remains the same — these agricultural experiments are safe and pose no threat to the health of mankind or the environment. As proven by the numerous lawsuits filed against corporations like Monsanto, however, the dangers are apparent and real.
Despite the growing concern against the negative effects of its experiments and products, Monsanto continues to get Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval and government subsidies so they can continue with their operations. In fact, the most popular herbicide in America, glyphosate, can now allegedly "be used without unreasonable risks to people or the environment," according to a statement made by the US EPA in 2013.
How does Monsanto's experiments operate, anyway? Scientists genetically splice natural, God-given seeds by inserting foreign DNA into the seed genome. Monsanto's most nefarious and far-reaching method of agricultural control came about when they started genetically altering seeds so that crops could only be grown using their very own herbicide, called Roundup (glyphosate).
Since the seed is designed to withstand Roundup, Monsanto can now control the entire industrial agricultural system by simply making crops glyphosate-immune and having Roundup dominate the market. Today, 80% of genetically modified crops, including corn, soy, canola, cotton, beets and alfalfa, contain Monsanto's original Roundup Ready gene.
Like rats in a cage, many people are unaware that the food they consume have been modified specifically to withstand Monsanto's famous herbicide. The food products that many people blindly consume on a daily basis come directly from crops sprayed with Roundup. Crops sprayed with Roundup are no longer healthy at all. Food that should nourish our system have instead become toxic pathways to many disease processes in the human body.
Glyphosate kills weeds by disrupting their shikimate pathway, where amino acids essential for their survival are synthesized. The shikimate pathway of Roundup Ready crops, on the other hand, are genetically engineered to withstand this attack.
Monsanto concludes that glyphosate is safe for humans because mammals do not have a shikimate pathway. However, what the biotech industry fails to recognize is that the shikimate pathway is also present in human gut bacteria. This diverse network of gut microbes (which are being destroyed by glyphosate) helps the human host digest food, synthesize vitamins and maintain immune system homeostasis. Additionally, gut microbes protect the gastrointestinal tract from being permeated by heavy metals and other foreign toxins. Glyphosate literally initiates disease processes in the body by suppressing and killing off these beneficial gut microbes, particularly through the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes.
Monsanto's claim about glyphosate's safety is continually being debunked. In March 2015, the consensus of independent scientists at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) revealed that there is "convincing evidence" that glyphosate causes cancer in lab animals.
As more and more data are published on the matter, people are starting to make the connection between Roundup exposure and cancer.
Enrique Rubio, a 58-year-old farmer from California who was diagnosed with bone cancer in 1995, was able to make a connection. For several years, he worked directly with Monsanto's Roundup in California, Oregon and Texas. He sprayed cucumbers, onions and other vegetable crops with glyphosate. He was always told the chemical was safe and posed no risk to his health — until one day, he was suddenly diagnosed with bone cancer. Today, he is accusing Monsanto of downplaying the risks of the herbicide he used countless times over several years.
On the same day Enrique filed suit, Judi Fitzgerald joined the fight from New York. The 64-year-old woman was diagnosed with leukemia in 2012. She worked directly with Roundup in the 1990s while working at a horticultural products company.
Both lawsuits claim that Monsanto's Roundup is a "defective" product that is "unreasonably dangerous." It also claims that Monsanto pressured the EPA to give Roundup the green light.
Even though the World Health Organization agrees and describes glyphosate as a "probable or possible carcinogen," the biotech industry has always fought back against scientifically validated allegations, not caring one bit about the people they have harmed, and — if all these experiments continue — will continue to harm in years to come.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051744_glyphosate_bone_cancer_farmer_lawsuits.html#ixzz3psVxqUDP
(NaturalNews) A clause in Barack Obama's Trans-Pacific Partnership would establish an even bigger monopoly for the pharmaceutical industry. The deal allows Big Pharma to block cancer patients from being able to access affordable drugs. Part of the US proposal extends de facto monopolies on biological medicines by up to eight years.
One cancer patient named Zahara Heckscher was recently arrested at a Westin Hotel in Atlanta, Georgia, for speaking about the issue while a Trans-Pacific Partnership meeting was taking place in the building. The meeting included policymakers from dozens of countries. Zahara was not welcome there.
She led her protest in the hallway outside the meeting with a shirt that read, "I Have Cancer. I Can't Wait Years." She is protesting the "death sentence" in the controversial TPP trade agreement. Not only is the agreement selling away Americans' sovereignty, destroying democracy and putting corporations in control, but it is also blocking countless cancer patients from receiving affordable cancer medications.
For those who have become dependent on cancer control drugs, the prices are set to go up under the TPP deal. The deal gives the biggest pharmaceutical companies strict control over the drug market, keeping affordable generics out and blocking more valuable therapies from ever competing in the medical marketplace.
Obama's TPP deal is literally a war on cancer patients. Those who expose what's going on, like Zahara Heckscher, are swiftly carried away by police. This video shows how Heckscher was treated when she came to the TPP meeting in Atlanta. She was whisked away in handcuffs because she refused to leave the area outside the meeting.
As the above video shows, democracy is dead in the US, and the government that is supposed to represent the people has been sold away to powerful industries and self-serving bureaucrats.
After the arrest, Heckscher explained her position: "For thousands of women to die unnecessary of breast cancer because of the TPP is a horrible, cruel, premeditated, and avoidable catastrophe. The provisions being decided by TPP ministers today could allow drug monopolies on biologics for 8 years. Some of these medicines cost up to tens of thousands, even hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. When you have breast cancer today, you can't wait 8 years or 7 years or 6 years for a treatment to become available or affordable.
"When you have cancer, even a one-year delay in affordable medicine can be a death sentence. That is why we call this proposed provision of the TPP a 'death sentence clause.' If it passes, thousands of women like me will die waiting," she stated.
As the pharmaceutical industry holds people's lives in the balance, the TPP deal brings on the final death blow for many, making struggling people beg for their cancer treatments. Heckscher has used trastuzumab (Hercepin) and pertuzumab (Perjeta) and is currently on denosumab (Xgeva) treatments while undergoing chemotherapy as part of a clinical trial. Under the new TPP deal, her access to these treatments may be cut off.
The good news for Zahara and millions of others is that there are many actions they can take personally to create an internal environment within their bodies to make cancer regress.
A powerful new documentary series called "The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest" is set to launch October 13, 2015, and will provide valuable information to cancer patients who have been sold out by Big Pharma and the government. Make sure to sign up for FREE while you can!
Sources for this article include:
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051498_Trans-Pacific_Partnership_Obama_cancer_patients.html#ixzz3o5Nn07Y4
(NaturalNews) The downfall of the Monsanto chemical empire could go down in history as having had its official launch in 2015, the year that its flagship herbicide Roundup was found by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a probable cause of cancer in humans. 2015 is also the year that it was revealed that Monsanto has been hiding the dirty details of this deadly chemical formula from regulatory authorities for nearly four decades.
An independent research scientist by the name of Anthony Samsel procured some 15,000 pages worth of documents from Monsanto covering the full gamut of research on Roundup, the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the information contained in those pages isn't pretty. In essence, Monsanto has known full well for nearly 40 years that Roundup and glyphosate are linked to organ damage and cancer, and yet this information was withheld from public purview as "proprietary trade secrets."
As a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Samsel has spent much of his career life studying the toxicological effects and bioactivity of Roundup. Based on a cohort of scientific data, he has come to the conclusion that Monsanto purposely failed to submit to regulators evidence showing that glyphosate isn't as safe or biodegradable as the company claims.
"Monsanto misrepresented the data," Samsel told listeners during a recent broadcast on the Progressive Radio Network (PRN) that aired on September 4. Monsanto "deliberately covered up data to bring the product [glyphosate] to market," he added.
For more alternative news like this, don't miss our exclusive news aggregation service at AlternativeNews.com.
What did this critical data show? According to Samsel, Monsanto intentionally corrupted animal studies by using animals that were already sick with cancer and organ failures as controls. Based on the metrics used in these studies, this made those animals exposed to glyphosate appear no more afflicted than the control animals because all of the animals ended up getting sick.
It's the same thing vaccine manufacturers do to make toxic vaccines appear "safe and effective": they give "controls" a different kind of vaccine than the one being tested so that all the test subjects are injected with some kind of vaccine. Then, when rates of encephalitis, autism, and other conditions appear generally equal among the test group and the controls, Monsanto is able to make the false claim that no additional adverse effects were observed.
"In order to minimize and cancel out its adverse findings, Samsel explained that Monsanto had relied upon earlier historical animal control data, toxicological research with lab animals afflicted with cancer and organ failures, and completely unrelated to glyphosate," explains an article by PRN about the scandal.
The PRN report adds that Monsanto routinely includes what it says are "extraneous studies" to hide or cancel out negative outcomes in other studies and make a particular chemical or GMO product appear safe when it actually isn't. This criminal tactic has allowed Monsanto and other chemical giants to spread millions of tons of deadly chemicals around the world without penalty when such products never should have gained regulatory approval in the first place.
"In effect, glyphosate received licensure based upon a platform of junk tobacco science," the report explains. "By ignoring cause and effect relationships behind the onset of multiple cancer and other life-threatening diseases throughout many of its research trials, Monsanto engaged in a radical scientific denialism that has since raked in tens of billions of dollars."
Sources for this article include:
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051450_glyphosate_cancer_risk_Monsanto.html#ixzz3nnCClpvz
********Anybody ready for a change?********
(NaturalNews) The White House has been caught in yet another lie, and one that it's repeated enough times now that there's no excusing it as just another careless faux pas. Desperate to defend its continued funding of abortion mill Planned Parenthood, the Obama regime is now claiming that this illicit baby chop-shop organization needs your tax dollars to continue providing mammograms to women, a service that it admittedly doesn't even offer.
That's right -- Obama and Co. wants Americans to believe that Planned Parenthood requires some half-a-million in taxpayer dollars annually to continue providing breast cancer screenings to women, even though Planned Parenthood doesn't, nor has it ever, offered breast cancer screenings to women. Obama's Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Mathews Burwell blatantly lied to the American public when she stated the following during a recent meeting with the House Education and Workforce Committee.
"What I think is important is that our HHS funding is focused on issues of preventative care for women, things like mammograms," she's quoted as saying.
More important than what Burwell thinks in her deluded mind, though, are the actual facts -- that Planned Parenthood doesn't offer mammograms. Planned Parenthood's supposed "preventative" services for breast cancer are a complete fabrication intended to persuade feeble minds into thinking, "Yeah, they're murdering babies and selling their body parts. But think about the women!"
Obama himself made the same false claim back in 2012 while on the campaign trail, alleging that "millions" of women receive mammograms from Planned Parenthood every year. In reality, the actual number of women who receive mammograms from Planned Parenthood every year is precisely zero, as admitted by even the left-leaning Washington Post (WP).
"The problem here is that Planned Parenthood does not perform mammograms or even possess the necessary equipment to do so," a resident fact-checker at WP admitted, defying the White House lie that the nation's largest abortion provider is in any way concerned with protecting women against breast cancer.
"As such, the organization certainly does not 'provide' mammograms in the strict sense. Instead, its clinics provide referrals and direct low-income women toward resources to help pay for the procedure. These services are by no means unique to Planned Parenthood. In fact, the Susan G. Komen Foundation and the American Cancer Society provide them, as well."
It's all par for the course for Obama's delinquent legacy, it seems -- lie after lie after lie, with some of these lies being the same lies repeated over and over and over again. The White House is even now lying about the undercover videos released by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), which clearly and undeniably expose Planned Parenthood for illegally selling aborted baby parts for profit.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest recently told the media that these videos are somehow "fraudulent," even though they contain hours of footage from Planned Parenthood officials and doctors openly talking about extracting aborted babies in a way that avoids "crushing" them so their body parts can be illegally sold to the highest bidder.
"Watch the videos for yourselves," encourages Michelle Malkin, writing for CNSNews.com. "Get the facts. Unmask the lies."
"The cackling profiteers of Planned Parenthood don't care about your breasts. They're too busy putting price tags on the baby hearts, livers, lungs and limbs swirling around in bloody pie plates, stacked in their 'research' labs, subsidized with your tax dollars and sold to the highest bidders. For 'preventative care,' of course."
Read more stories about what Planned Parenthood is really doing at Abortions.news
Also, read the truth about Margaret Sanger at TruthWiki.org
Sources for this article include:
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051001_womens_health_abortion_regime_Planned_Parenthood.html#ixzz3kWYgbIxF
Surgery to remove the uterus is suggested for most women with endometrial cancer. Most women with this disease undergo a method to remove the uterus (hysterectomy), as well as to eliminate the fallopian tubes and ovaries (salpingo-oophorectomy). A hysterectomy makes it impossible for you to have young kids in the future. Furthermore, once your ovaries are taken, you will experience menopause, if you have not currently. During surgery, your surgeon will furthermore inspect the areas around your uterus to look for signals that cancer has disperse. Your surgeon may furthermore eliminate lymph nodes for testing. This assists determine your cancer's stage.
Radiation therapy is the treatment for Endometrial Cancer, therapy utilizes powerful energy beams, such as X-rays, to eradicate cancer cells. In some examples, your doctor may recommend radiation to reduce your risk of a cancerrecurrence after surgery. If you are not healthy sufficient to undergo surgery, you may opt for radiation therapy only. In women with advanced endometrial cancer, radiation therapy may help control cancer-related pain. Radiation therapy can engage: Radiation from a machine outside your body. Called external beam radiation, throughout this method you lie on a table while a device directs radiation to exact points on your body. Radiation placed interior your body. Internal radiation, or brachytherapy, involves putting a radiation-filled apparatus, such as small kernels, wires or a cylinder, inside your vagina for a short period of time.
Patner Profile: apartment for rent
Enthusiastic about Alternative Cancer Therapies? Looking for support? Go to Cancer Alternatives Support Forum.
forum viewed 1,070,131 times
topics per page limited to: 20
average number of messages per page: 181
Copyright 1999 - 2017 www.curezone.org