Again, you lie and mislead. ... ... ParaZapper does kill algae but NOT just algae. It kills bacte...
Again, you lie and mislead.
ParaZapper does kill algae but NOT just algae. It kills bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and other microbes. The water test is proof that it can do this while the BBBE does not. Microscopic examination shows that ParaZapper was successful in killing all of these microbes, not just algae that you try to mislead people into believing.
ParaZapper includes not only the Beck frequency ( very exact, not crude like yours ) as well as Clark, Rife, and Crane. So, yes, because it contains both 3.915 Hz and 4.00 Hz, ParaZapper qualifies as Beck.
Additional information: ... ... 1) Inactivation studies on the effects of PEF on bacterial spore...
1) Inactivation studies on the effects of PEF on bacterial spores are scarce and results vary. Early studies (Sale and Hamilton 1967) reported that Bacillus spp. spores were resistant to exponential wave PEF with strength fields up to 30 kV/cm. Only after germination did they become sensitive to PEF.
This is one reason why Dr. Clark recommended a 20 minute rest between zapping sessions.
2) Treatment time is defined as the product of the number pulses and the pulse duration. An increase in any of these variables increases microbial inactivation ... The inactivation of microorganisms increases with an increase in treatment time
So, in cases where lower voltages are applied, the effects can be compensated for by increasing the time of application / number of pulses applied.
The information provided give a basis for the efficacy of Hulda Clark type zappers in the suppression of microbial activity. The results of such application of low voltage pulsed electric fields on water based environments may be viewed as proof of potential effectiveness for ParaZapper only as so far, it is the only product of this type which has been successful in such a complete range of microbial inactivation: http://huldaclarkparazapper.com/cart/images/Water_zapping_jars_b_070813_reg.jpg
This is believed to be as a result of the multi-frequency application of square waves.
I was recently sent this: From an online social media producer: ... ”Google/youtube and all the bi...
I was recently sent this: From an online social media producer:
"Google/youtube and all the big social networks are vastly scaling back revenue on not just the small producers but especially if they go into topics the money powers don't like. ... also occurred with zapper videos too."
Additionally, I was told that a post supporting zappers only received a tenth of what other posts received.