Is that it? Is this the long-awaited refutation of Thorn's 'copy/pasta'? A string of meaningless generalities and a straw man - namely, Jesus is not the Father? I've yet to meet a Christian who says He is. Yet you have somehow managed to convince yourself that this is standard fayre among those you despise so much. Begs the question whether you have ever understood the doctrine of the Trinity as it relates to the Father and the Son.
I'll agree with you about the importance of context, general tenor, analogy of Scripture, etc. All good points. But show me a single instance where Thorn's summary fails the context test, to the extent that the intended meaning is something other than the general thesis that Jesus is God.
and so does this board. i award you no points for creativity.
Challenge the message and not the messenger!
The first person to resort to name calling and personal attacks automatically loses the debate!
Personal attack is often the best indication that the writer knows his logic is flawed and therefore tries to deflect attention by attacking the opponent, instead of attacking the arguments of the opponent.
forum viewed 11,244,164 times
topics per page limited to: 10
average number of messages per page: 97
Copyright 1999 - 2017 www.curezone.org