The medical industry will never admit this, but being gay is just a symptom of the declining health of our species. Humans are indeed dying genetically. Mutations are occuring at warp speed because of our diets and because of the diets of our parents. This is why cancer, diabetes, MS, and an assortment of other degenerative diseases are rampant nowdays....because they are being passed down by our parents via epigenetics (non-DNA-related inheritance). But guess what.....being gay is just another one of these "diseases." For anyone who thinks being gay is not a choice...you may be right....check it out. The following is a decades-old experiment that you will never see repeated nowdays....not only does it contradict neo-darwinism, but it exposes that there is a reason for today's high rates of cancer, diabetes, Depression, homosexuality and other so-called "diseases."
"Perhaps the best illustration of this is the Pottenger cat study, an amazing yet simple experiment run over 10 years. It has since been repeated using different test subjects, all with the same results.
This study demonstrates clearly that the consumption of some of the kind of foods encouraged on Western diets leads to quiet, long-term degeneration of body parts, reproductive ability, and so on, and later manifests itself as degenerative diseases and, surprise, obesity due to toxicity when systems start to fail. The problem with these kinds of foods comes in on a level previously unconsidered by most people.
The Pottenger's Cats study was done by Dr. Francis Pottenger between 1932 and 1942 using about 900 cats. The study itself was conducted together with Dr. Alvin Foord who was a professor of pathology at the University of Southern California. It was a study that was done under very specific scientific conditions with a very actuate record keeping, observation, and statistical analysis. In fact, all the 600 cats had complete medical histories even before the experiment began.
The cats were divided into two groups. There was a control group that was given a raw food diet that was composed of raw meat, milk, and cod liver oil. Then there was the other group given a diet that was composed of cooked meat and milk plus the cod liver oil. The following is what happened over several generations of cats.
The control group that was given a raw diet remained healthy and gave birth to healthy cats in the first generation. The cats that were given the cooked foods also give birth to healthy appearing cats in the first generation. In the second generation, the cats started to have even more noticeable differences. Within the first two generations, it is not readily apparent what the damaged of the cooked foods is. However, the most observable effect (and the most amazing one) happened to the fourth generation cats. For the cats that were eating raw foods, their fourth generation kittens were just fine. Just like any other normal healthy cats. However, the group of cats that were eating cooked foods could not produce the fourth generation of cats. In other words, there was no fourth generation cats available to study for the cooked foods cats. All cats of the third generation that had grown up on the cooked die! ts could not give birth to any offspring that was healthy. Some did not give birth, and those that did only gave birth to kittens that lived for less than six months. Now remember that in both groups the food quantity was kept the same. Both the cats that ate the cooked foods and the ones that ate the raw foods ate the same amount of food. The only difference was that one group was given cooked foods and the other was not. And the only foods these cats were given were strictly meat, milk, and cod liver oil. Nothing extra was given to any of the cats.
Okay, let us see what other changes they discovered in these cats. The cats eating raw foods grew up to be of uniform size and development and their fur, tissues, and skeleton were perfect as normal. The amount of calcium and phosphorous in their bones was also all right. Their organs grew well as normal. Their nervous system was working well and their coordination was perfect. They were very resistant to infections. All their offspring were fine. Their mental state was very stable and friendly. And you could play with them. There was also no birth complication and nursing and giving birth was just normal. The cats gave birth to an average of five kittens each one weighing roughly 119 grams.
However, the cats that were eating cooked meat and milk increasingly, with each new generation, gave birth to other cats that had abnormal variations in their skeletal structure. Their bones became soft and brittle by the time they reached the third generation. And from the very first generation onwards, the following problems were noticed with all the cats that were eating cooked foods: poor eyesight, heart problems, thyroid and bladder problems, nervous system problems, meningitis and paralysis, infections of various organs, ovary and testis problems, liver problems, bone problems, nearsightedness or farsightedness, inflammations, uterine congestion, atrophy of various organs, failure of reproductive systems, and so on. The cats eating cooked foods also aborted about 25% of the offspring in the first generation, about 70% of the offspring in the second generation, and in all cases the delivery was difficult and sometimes the females died ! giving birth. The kittens that were born of mothers that were eating cooked foods were born about 19 grams less than the ones that were born from cats eating raw foods. Their skins also started to go bad, showing parasites, lesions, and allergies. With each generation, these problems became even worse.
By the third generation, the catsí bones from the group that ate the cooked foods had actually become rubber-like. Their mental status was also not normal anymore. With each new generation, the cats became more unpredictable, were more irritable, were biting and scratching more, were less playful, and so on. The males also became very docile and experienced a drop in their libido and sexual interest while the females became very aggressive. There was also a huge increase in SAME SEX SEXUAL ACTIVITY (my emphasis).
The cats were then returned to the normal raw food diet and taken off the cooked foods diet to see what would happen. It took about four generations of cats eating a normal healthy diet for the first cats to be born that was absolutely normal. So this is what we know from this experiment. The cats were given cooked foods for four generations to see what would happen. But by the third generation it was impossible to get a fourth generation. These cats were then given their normal raw food to see what happens and it took about four generations to go back to complete normalcy.
Weíre not sure how many generations it takes for the human species to go to complete chaos like the cats did, but we can already see signs of it. Each new human generation being born today has even more complications and health issues at younger ages than previous ones. We now see children getting diseases that were previously only seen in older people. But let us go back to looking at the cats again. What the scientists found out was that different parts of the catsí body systems took different amounts of time to go back to normal. Some systems took one generation; some took two generations and so on. But generally, for these cats, it took about four generations for everything to go back to normal.
Here are some more findings from this experiment. The experiment was repeated again but this time instead of the cats receiving cooked meat, they received one-third of the diet in raw meat plus two-thirds of their diet in pasteurized, sweetened condensed or corporate milk. So the only change this time was to make the milk processed in some way. Once again, the results were pretty much the same. Even though the meat was raw this time, the presence of processed milk still resulted in problems. The other thing that they noticed was that once the female cats was given about 12 to 18 months of a diet that was composed of cooked foods, they were never again able to give birth to normal kittens and all her kittens would be defective in some way or the other.
A similar experiment was done using rats. The rats were studied by a completely different set of scientists. To summarize, there were two groups of rats. One group was raised on whole wheat that was healthy and organic, and another group was raised on commercial white flour, the kind that you find in the supermarket. The rats that were raised on white flour ended up under-sized, unable to reproduce, aggressive and hostile, and with many reports of tooth decay. The rats that were raised on whole wheat had no problems.
Another study that was done that is similar to these was one that was done using pigs. Again, one group of pigs was given a diet that was processed. And once again, they had health problems and deformed offspring. However, with pigs it only took one generation of healthy eating for the offspring to be born normal again.
So as you can see, it appears that different animals, eating different foods, have different rates of getting sick and getting well due to the introduction of processed foods, but all of them degenerated because of cooked foods. That is the one constant, the degeneration of the body, the mind and emotions with introduction of a large percentage of processed and cooked foods. There is much more to this than can be said in a short article, but it begins to paint a clear picture.
Since the 1950s, we have been following some very incorrect and unnatural guidelines regarding food, weight, and its link to health. Ever since then, we have become the only species on earth to have obesity problems and die of degenerative diseases. Paradoxically, we are also the only species that counts calories, is perpetually on a diet, and just can't seem to get lean and healthy. Why is that so? And why did it only start in the 1950s? Recently, the answers have been coming through and the truth is progressively being exposed. Have you ever asked yourself, ďWhat if everything I know about food is wrong?Ē What would that mean to your life and your efforts?"
B re-read this paragraph:
"The Pottenger's Cats study was done by Dr. Francis Pottenger between 1932 and 1942 using about 900 cats. The study itself was conducted together with Dr. Alvin Foord who was a professor of pathology at the University of Southern California. It was a study that was done under very specific scientific conditions with a very actuate record keeping, observation, and statistical analysis. In fact, all the 600 cats had complete medical histories even before the experiment began."
Were they using 900 or 600 cats?
What exactly are "very specific scientific conditions?"
So why did Jesus make it so that cooked food causes homosexuality in mammals? For something He hates so much, it seems to me that making humans go gay when improperly fed isn't exactly a wise maneuver on his part. I mean, it's one thing for folks to make choices, but it's quite another to be completely powerless to be gay just because your ancestors have been poisoned for generations.
"So why did Jesus make it so that cooked food causes homosexuality in mammals? For something He hates so much, it seems to me that making humans go gay when improperly fed isn't exactly a wise maneuver on his part. I mean, it's one thing for folks to make choices, but it's quite another to be completely powerless to be gay just because your ancestors have been poisoned for generations."
Man's sin caused his demise....eating improperly just brings it on quicker.
Scientists have not even been able to properly trace the origin of cat species.
Take cats from Burma for example. They are known to sit by the temple and look around. They are fed raw green foods high in chlorophyll, fruits, etc..
Now, take for example the cat's purr. Some say purring is a sign that the cat is happy ( such as a cat sitting on a person's lap for ex.)
Yet, cats also purr when they are in pain, giving birth, etc.
Their babies purr when they are nursing.
First, "modern science" lacks the ability to investigate "the first cause" of a particular thing.
The study merely experiments with change of diet. The results are drastic.
But your thinking is erroneous to conclude things about homosexuality.
How on God's green earth do you think these things up?
Pottenger did not set out with a purpose to STUDY homosexuality in cats.
You're making things fit neatly into the BOX called your mind.
If you were a doctor I'd be afraid- run for the nearest exit-
there's an escaped mad scientist.
Have a nice day...
One day, if you are so inlined (or not) ask me what's wrong with "THE BOX".
They seem to be saying that by the 3rd generation there is increased same gender sexuality. BUT, do you think we have had 3 generations of humans eating crappy food? If you figure a decline started when the U.S. became more urbanized and started eating more refined, processed foods, which started about the turn of the last century, yeah, there have been 3 generations. But much of that third generation is just now entering adulthood, so would not account for any preceived increase in the number of homosexuals. And most people date the real decline in the food we eat to post-WW2; so any third generations is very young.
Hummm, what could this mean? Maybe that the number of homosexuals now is the same percentage that generally occurs in human populations (they have been around for a long time) but they are just not hiding as they once did. So just maybe as the 3rd and 4th, etc., generations of crappy eaters are born there will be even more homosexuals.
It is true: Unhealthy people do unhealthy things. There is a parasite that are can infect rats, and the rats will subconsciously put itself in a cat's way to be eaten because the parasite wants to be in the cat where its(the parasite's)survival is better. That rat was sick. For humans, we also get parasite, and they lead us to do things we would not normally do in healthier bodies.
The SAD, and the chemicals that are in meat, steroids, antibiotics, pestisides in the feed, herbicides, toxify our bodies, and makes us act strangely, and many times destructively. Our bodies are CLOGGED UP with these toxins, inflammatories, and gunk. Not to mention the steroids makes us more aggressive towards each other.
Becoming gay could be an effect of our poor health because the decision to be gay is not healthy, and it won't make you live longer.
This is absolutely rediculous. Although i agree that there are genetic factors,
its rediculous to even think this is a new thing. Firstly, animals of many
kinds practice homosexuality and they are not sibect to our eating habits.
Secondly, Its not a new phenomenon. Homosexuality has been around since recorded history began. It did not pop up with fast food.