Hello skylar1212 and jenifer,
Interesting posts from both of you. Thanks.
Let me suggest a couple of things here and suggestions they are only. Firstly I do not know BLISK12 so cannot comment directly.
There is an issue here as I read it. Probiotics (MO'S)are usually not intended to be absorbed by the body but rather live inside the digestive tract/gut. So using lingual absorption may not be relevant. That said there could be some MO's which are absorbed via lingual absorption. No-one would know for certain.
The first point of inquiry I suspect would be to identify the MO's you are getting from BLISK12 and ask the producer what are the usual modes of assimilation.
Your comment here:
"Oil pulling is as powerful as chlorhexidine." How do you know this?
jenifer have you tried xylitol with oil. I recognise that absorption of xylitol is not an issue as I understand it. So assuming xylitols own bacteria fighting talents I suspect that they may be mutually supportive. I shall try that myself.
Here on is all conjecture:
On the issue of dumping/swallowing detox and assimilation
The given reason for dumping the oil is the contaminants, mouth Bacteria (Mo's) and HM's, are in the oil and swallowing them is bad. That is only true if they can be reabsorbed or able to on-culture in the case of MO's. How likely is that?
The Mo's will only on-culture if the conditions are suitable for them. The other gut MO's may well control them, not to mention the effects of stomach acid and the fact that those Mo's are already either "controlled" by the stomach acid or the gut already. Isn't that what is happening now anyway?
The reassimilation of HM's? I am assuming that Hm's are detoxed into the mouth which is unproven as I understand it. The reabsorption will depend on what degree of mineral lockup is available in the digestive tract. There are a number of substances which can do this and their presence or otherwise will influence HM reabsorption.
Please criticise any of this thinking. T2