I think I will try to do the same with the zapper. I am thinking of doing up to 4 frequency selector unit. That should put the frequency question to rest. And hopefully more manufactures start making multi-frequency units.
Here is very interesting study on zapping effectiveness on Candida Albicans by a polish doctor:
What is interesting is the description of the most effective device in this study: "In our study, the source of alternative current was the Medikzap device designed by the
Medi-Flowery Company Ltd. (Fig. 1). It generates a square wave current of basic frequency within the 25 - 40kHz range with a rich spectrum of harmonic components above 1MHz. Another generator was also used (Fig. 2) of a much simpler design based on the popular NE 555 integrated circuit. This device generates a square wave current with a frequency characteristic directly resulting from the parameters of the integrated circuit"
They have also tested Dr. Beck device and plain alternating current, and plain always on DC current. Conclusion is that on Albicans the most effective device is pulsed positive offset units.
Beck device is highly effective against strong viruses like HIV, Zapper is highly effective against parasites and molds like Albicans.
Perhaps zapper just needs bit more juice, the limit is 15V on the 555 timer chip, feeding this voltage trough a step up circuit or 2x 9V batteries passed through 15V regulator should accomplish this trick.
The other thing is how to accomplish this "rich spectrum of harmonic components above 1MHz"? This suggests that "the Medikzap" device is using two frequency generators one to create low amplitude harmonics at 1MHz and the other takes that creating 20-40KHz frequency output. I think two 555 chips with two input sources 9V creating 30KHz and 1.5V creating 1MHz should accomplish this, just join the output from these two chips at plus handle. (I'm not sure if this would work as we have to return 10.5V at negative side of both batteries. I never done this so I do not know if it is feasible.)
Perhaps it is best use one V source to run the signal first through 1MHZ timer then through 30KHz timer. Again I'm not sure if that would work.
Any thoughts and contributions are welcomed to the discussion.
I have seen your “single 9V battery unit”
Good work, again!
> “I am thinking of doing up to 4 frequency selector unit. That should put the frequency question to rest.”
Even a 200 frequency zapper will not put the frequency question at rest, as long as the frequency role in a zapper will be misunderstood.
For experimenting the role of frequency on a zapper, you could build one with
= 30kHz (best transfer and a good reference to compare other frequencies)
= 10kHz (healing frequency used by Rife’s school, and still a very good transfer)
= 2.5kHz for its popularity
= 1.0kHz for zappicator’s use
= 15Hz to experiment how good it could be compared to 30kHz.
But any frequency of your choice will do.
An interesting point used on the M.Zap3, is a duty cycle as long as zapper’s effect permits it.
It has been implemented in the Ultimated Zapper with an horrible explanation of its “penetrating power”, but long duty cycle has good advantages.
If you have a 555 version, it will be easy to implement with only one frequency, but with many, it will be an interesting challenge.
Because you have the freedom of choice for your components, use a multiturn trim pot (Multi turn potentiometers are very expensive) on your zapper, “à la M.Zap4R fashion”. Many more experiments with different frequencies will be available.
I will contact you for our eMail and will be glad to help, if help is needed.
I have been surfing around Medikzap, Medi-Flowery and the 2 studies you point to.
There is very little information on what is so special about Medikzap. It seems to work with a microcontroller (4 programs).
Any zapper with a 555 and a square wave is “rich in harmonics”
> “with a rich spectrum of harmonic components above 1MHz”
I miss this part on the readings.
As stated by h. Clark (our best reference source so far), parasites as we define them, have a frequency band from around 77kHz to around 878kHz.
Human range is from 1500kHz to 9500kHz.
A 555 has an upper frequency of 500kHz to 800kHz, depending on source. This is an excellent choice for a zapper.
If you go higher than 1MHz, you are going too close to human lower end band.
Be careful on your experiments if you go so high.
> “Perhaps zapper just needs bit more juice”
Cranking up the voltage on a zapper is to be used with caution.
If you go higher than 12V, a zapper becomes quickly unpleasant to use, and small skin burns can be an easy result.
Do not compare Beck “high voltage” zapper with Clark “Low voltage zapper”.
What makes a zapper efficient is current at destination, not voltage at the source.
> “I think two 555 chips with two input sources 9V creating 30KHz and 1.5V creating 1MHz should accomplish this, just join the output from these two chips at plus handle. (I'm not sure if this would work as we have to return 10.5V at negative side of both batteries. I never done this so I do not know if it is feasible.)”
Connecting the output of two 555 chips is easy to do : Use a 1k_ohm resistor at the output of each 555, and join them to the output of the zapper. Each 1k_Ohm will protect its 555 from being short circuited by the other one.
Wave form will be mixed at the junction point.
I’m very skeptical about the end result, as you expect it, but…
First time I heard about a zapper, I was even more skeptical on any result at all …
My own meager contribution would be to suggest that you sweep the frequency range from around 77kHz to around 800kHz (the parasite bandwidth). Repeated as a series of rising (and falling?) frequency pulses.
If you could hear this it would sound like a rising pitch police siren wailing up and down in frequency.
How easy it would be to do this? I don't know, but someone would point in the right direction I am sure.
Becks blood cleansing device is not a frequency device or a positive offset zapper. It kills with current instead. Ideally DC would be used but their is a problem with the electroplating effect. So Beck chose 4 Hz. The important thing is to keep the frequency low.
Their is a unit made by Scada Research that uses 2 slightly higher frequencies 4Hz, 16Hz, and 100Hz. This is to decrease the chance of electroporation.
It may be exciting to combine both Clark and Beck types into one unit.
Shouldn't be too difficult. A Clark circuit on the same board as a Beck circuit. Just switch between the two circuits at a set interval, say every 5 or 10 seconds or so with a mechanical relay or a solid state relay.