Co-Existing Mycoplasma, Bacteria and Virus in CFS
(CFS) patients show evidence of multiple, systemic bacterial and viral infections that could play an important role in CFS morbidity. CFS patients had a high prevalence (51%) of one of four Mycoplasma species and often showed evidence of co-infections with different Mycoplasma species, Chlamydia pneumoniae and/or active Human Herpes Virus-6 (HHV-6). We found that 8% of the CFS patients showed evidence of C. pneumoniae and 31% of active HHV-6 infections.
Date: 3/9/2005 12:51:54 AM ( 10 y ) ... viewed 3573 times
Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 2003; 11(2):7-20
Evidence for Bacterial (Mycoplasma, Chlamydia) and Viral (HHV-6) Co-Infections in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients
Garth L. Nicolson,1 PhD, Marwan Y. Nasralla,2 PhD, Kenny De Meirleir,3 MD, PhD, Robert Gan,2 MB, PhD and Joerg Haier,4 MD, PhD
1The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, California, USA,, 2International Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., Huntington Beach, California, USA, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium and 4Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Munster, Germany
Correspondence: Prof. Garth L. Nicolson, Office of the President, The Institute for Molecular Medicine, 15162 Triton Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92649. Tel: 714-903-2900; Fax: 714-379-2082; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; Website: www.immed.org
SUMMARY. Using the blood of 100 CFS patients and forensic polymerase chain reaction we have found that a majority of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) patients show evidence of multiple, systemic bacterial and viral infections that could play an important role in CFS morbidity. CFS patients had a high prevalence (51%) of one of four Mycoplasma species and often showed evidence of co-infections with different Mycoplasma species, Chlamydia pneumoniae and/or active Human Herpes Virus-6 (HHV-6). We found that 8% of the CFS patients showed evidence of C. pneumoniae and 31% of active HHV-6 infections. Since the presence of one or more chronic systemic infections may predispose patients to other infections, we examined the prevalence of C. pneumoniae and active HHV-6 infections in Mycoplasma-positive and -negative patients. The incidence of C. pneumoniae or HHV-6 was similar in mycoplasma-positive and -negative patients, suggesting that such infections occur independently in CFS patients. Also, the incidence of C. pneumoniae in active HHV-6-positive and -negative patients was similar. Control subjects (n=100) had low rates of mycoplasmal (6%), active HHV-6 (9%) or chlamydial (1%) infections, and there were no co-infections in control subjects. Differences in bacterial and/or viral infections in CFS patients compared to control subjects were significant. The results indicate that a relatively large subset of CFS patients show evidence of bacterial and viral co-infections.
Chronic illnesses like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) are usually complex, heterogeneous and involve multiple, nonspecific, overlapping signs and symptoms (1, 2). Such illnesses are usually difficult to diagnose and treat (3-5). CFS for the most part does not have effective therapies, and therefore patients often do not completely recover from their illness, even with therapy (3). CFS patients can be subdivided into clinically relevant subcategories that may represent different disease states or co-morbid conditions or illnesses (6). Identifying systemic infections, such as those produced by Mycoplasma species (4-9), Chlamydia pneumoniae (10) and Human Herpes Virus-6 (HHV-6) (11-13), is likely to be important in determining the treatment strategies for many CFS patients.
Although no single underlying cause has been established for CFS, there is growing awareness that CFS can have an infectious nature that is either causative for the illness, a cofactor for the illness or appears as an opportunistic infection(s) that aggravate patient morbidity (14). There are several reasons for this (15), including the nonrandom or clustered appearance of CFS, sometimes in immediate family members (16, 17), the presence of certain signs and symptoms associated with infection, the often cyclic course of the illness and its response to anti-microbial therapies (4, 5, 14).
Here we examined CFS patients to see if a subset of patients had more than one type of chronic bacterial or viral infection. We were particularly interested in assessing whether patients with one type of infection were more likely to show evidence of additional infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All patients were from North America (Canada and the United States, n=100) and underwent a medical history, completed a sign/symptom illness survey and had routine laboratory tests. If necessary, medical records were also reviewed to determine if patients suffered from organic or psychiatric illnesses that could explain their symptoms. When positive results were found in any of the evaluations that met the Fukuda et al. (2) exclusionary criteria, the patients were not included in the study. Additionally, all subjects were questioned about medication use during the three months prior to the study, and they had to be free of antibiotic treatment for two months prior to blood collection. Control subjects (n=100) had to be free of disease for at least three months prior to data collection, and they had to be free of antibiotic treatment for three months prior to blood collection.
Blood was collected in EDTA-containing tubes and immediately brought to ice bath temperature as described previously (18-20). Samples were shipped with wet ice by air courier to the Institute for Molecular Medicine and International Molecular Diagnostics, Inc for analysis. All blood samples were blinded. Whole blood (50 ml) was used for preparation of DNA using Chelex (Biorad, Hercules, USA) as follows. Blood cells were lysed with nano-pure water (1.3 ml) at room temperature for 30 min. After centrifugation at 13 000 x g for 2 min, the supernatants were discarded. Chelex solution (200 ml) was added, and the samples were incubated at 56°C and at 100°C for 15 minutes each. Aliquots from the centrifuged samples were used immediately for PCR or flash frozen and stored at -70°C until use. Multiple aliquots were used for experiments on all patient samples.
Detection of Mycoplasma by Forensic PCR.
Amplification of the target gene sequences (18-20) was performed in a total volume of 50 ml PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, pH 9) containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 200 mm each of dATP, dTTP, dGTP, dCTP, 100 pmol of each primer, and 0.5-1 mg of chromosomal DNA. Purified mycoplasmal DNA (0.5-1 ng of DNA) was used as a positive control for amplification. Additional primer sets were used to confirm the species specificity of the reaction. The amplification was carried out for 40 cycles with denaturing at 94°C and annealing at 60°C (genus-specific primers and M. penetrans) or 55°C (M. pneumoniae, M. hominis, M. fermentans). Extension temperature was 72°C in all cases. Finally, product extension was performed at 72°C for 10 min. Negative and positive controls were present in each experiment. The amplified samples were run on a 1% agarose gel containing 5 ml/100 ml of ethidium bromide in TAE buffer (0.04 M Tris-Acetate, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0). After denaturing and neutralization, Southern blotting was performed as described below (18-20).
Chlaymdia pneumoniae Detection by Forensic PCR.
PCR detection of Chlaymdia pneumoniae was done as described above for various Mycoplasma species, except that the conditions and primers differ. PCR was carried out using the C. pneumoniae-specific primers:
5'-TGACAACGTTAGAAATACAGC-3' (upstream) and downstream 5'-CGCCTCTCTCTCCTATAAAT-3'. Additional primer sets were used to confirm the species specificity of the reaction. The DNA was amplified for 30 cycles using standard cycle parameters, and the product evaluated by agarose-gel electrophoresis. The efficiency of the PCR process was monitored by amplification of b-actin mRNA. The presence of amplifications inhibitors will be evaluated by spiking negative samples with 2 ml of DNA from stock. C. pneumoniae-specific oligonucleotides in the PCR product were identified by Southern Blot and dot-blot hybridization using a 21-mer internal probe:
(5'-CGTTGAGTCAACGACTTAAGG-3') 3' end-labelled with digoxigenin-UTP or 32P-labeled probe.
Active HHV-6 Detection by Forensic PCR.
PCR detection of active HHV-6A was done as described above, except that blood plasma was used instead of whole blood and the conditions and primers differed. PCR reactions were carried out using the following HHV-6A-specific primers:
5'-GCGTTTTCAGTGTGTAGTTCGGCAG-3' (upstream) and downstream 5'-TGGCCGCATTTCGTACAGATACGGAGG-3'. The nucleotides were amplified for 30 cycles using standard cycle parameters, and the product evaluated by agarose-gel electrophoresis. Additional primer sets were used to confirm the specificity of the reaction. The efficiency of the PCR process was monitored by amplification of b-actin mRNA. The presence of amplification inhibitors was evaluated by spiking negative samples with 2 ml of DNA from stock. HHV-6A-specific oligonucleotides in the PCR product were identified by Southern Blot and dot-blot hybridization using a 21-mer internal probe: (5'-ATCCGAAACAACTGTCTGACTGGCA-3') 3' end-labelled with digoxigenin-UTP or 32P-labeled probe.
Southern Blot Confirmation
The amplified samples were run on a 1% agarose gel containing 5 ml/100 ml of ethidium bromide in TAE buffer (0.04 M Tris-Acetate, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0). After denaturating and neutralization, Southern blotting was performed as follows. The PCR product was transferred to a Nytran membrane. After transfer, UV cross-linking was performed. Membranes were prehybridized with hybridization buffer consisting of 1x Denhardt's solution and 1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA as blocking reagent. Membranes were then hybridized with digoxigenin-UTP or 32P-labeled internal probe (107 cpm per bag). After hybrization and washing to remove unbounded probe, the membranes were examined (digoxigenin-UTP-labeled probe) or exposed to autoradiography film (32P-labeled probe) for 1- 2 days at -70°C.
Subjects' demographic characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics and students' t-tests (independent samples test, t-test for equality of means, 2-tailed). The 95% confidence interval was chosen for minimal significance.
Patients and Control Subjects
Patients and control subjects were approximately similar in age characteristics (control subjects mean age = 34.6; CFS patients: mean age = 39.7). CFS patients differed significantly according to sex distribution (P< 0.05); 72% of the patients were female, while 28% of the patients were male. Similarly, 69% of control subjects were female, while 31% were male (Table 1). All CFS patients fulfilled current international CDC case definition for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2).
Chronic Infections in CFS Patients
Chronic infections were not found in 29% of CFS patients and 88% of control subjects (Table 2). When we examined CFS patients' blood for the presence of chronic infections using forensic PCR, evidence for Mycoplasma species infections were found in 51% of CFS patients and 7% of control subjects. Evidence for C. pneumoniae infections were found in 8% of CFS patients and in 1% of control subjects, and evidence for active HHV-6 infections were found in 31% of CFS patients and 9% of control subjects. We did not find any multiple co-infections in control subjects. The differences between chronic infections in CFS patients and control subjects were significant (Mycoplasma species, P<0.001; HHV-6, P<0.05; C. pneumoniae, P<0.01) (Table 2).
Multiple mycoplasmal Co-Infections in CFS Patients
Using species-specific primers and PCR the incidence of various Mycoplasma species in the blood of CFS patients was examined. M. pneumoniae infections were observed in 29 of 51 Mycoplasma-positive CFS patients, M. fermentans infections occurred in 22 patients and M. hominis in 16 patients, whereas M. penetrans infections were found at lower (8 of 51 Mycoplasma-positive patients) incidence (Table 3). We examined 100 control subjects who did not show clinical signs and symptoms and found that 7 were positive for a single species of Mycoplasma (Table 2). Differences between CFS patients and control subjects were significant (P<0.001).
Single infections with one of the four Mycoplasmas that were tested were observed in 29 of the 51 (56.9%) Mycoplasma-positive patients (Table 3). In the seven control subjects that were positive for mycoplasmal infections we found two controls that were positive for M. fermentans, three for M. pneumoniae and one for M. hominis and one for M. penetrans but these were found only as single infections. Similar to a previous study (19), the most commonly observed infection was M. pneumoniae (29 of 51 Mycoplasma-positive patients), followed by M. fermentans in 22 patients, M. hominis in 16 patients and M. penetrans in 8 patients. Multiple mycoplasmal infections were detected in 22 of the 51 Mycoplasma-positive patients (43.1% of the Mycoplasma-positive patients), whereas single infections were found in 29/51 (56.9% of the Mycoplasma-positive patients). Similar to our previous results (25), we have not found patients positive for all four of the tested Mycoplasma species. In previous studies on North American (19) and European (6) CFS patients with multiple mycoplasmal infections, all patients showed combinations of M. pneumoniae and/or M. fermentans (with or without other species). The combination of M. hominis and M. penetrans was not seen. Similar results were found here where the most commonly found combination of Mycoplasma species were M. fermentans plus M. pneumoniae, M. fermentans plus M. hominis or M. hominis plus M. pneumoniae. The most common triple infection found was M. fermentans plus M. hominis plus M. pneumoniae found in two patients (Table 3).
Co-Infections with HHV-6 in CFS Patients
Similar to others, we found evidence of (active) HHV-6 infections in the plasma in approximately 31% of patients with CFS. This finding is similar but somewhat lower than previously reported for CFS patients in other studies (11-13). When we examined the incidence of HHV-6 infections in Mycoplasma-positive and -negative patients, we found that there was no preference for active HHV-6 infections in Mycoplasma-infected patients (Table 3). Evidence for active HHV-6 infections was found by examination of blood plasma, and we found that 31.4% of Mycoplasma-positive CFS patients also had HHV-6. Similarly, in Mycoplasma-negative patients evidence of active HHV-6 infections was found in 29.4% of patients (Table 3). There was also no preference for particular Mycoplasma species in HHV-6 co-infections (data not shown). In control subjects without evidence of signs or symptoms we found evidence for active HHV-6 infections in 9 of 100 subjects. None of these HHV-6-positive control subjects showed other infections (Table 2).
Co-Infections with C. pneumoniae in CFS Patients
Chlamydia pneumoniae infections were found in 8% of CFS patients (Table 3) and one control subject out of 100 that also did not have mycoplasmal or HHV-6 infections (Table 2). This finding is similar but somewhat lower than previously reported for CFS patients (10). When we examined the incidence of C. pneumoniae infections in Mycoplasma-positive and -negative patients, we found that there was no preference for multiple infections, nor was there a preference for particular Mycoplasma species in C. pneumoniae Mycoplasma co-infections. In Mycoplasma-positive or -negative patients C. pneumoniae infections were found in 4 patients in each group. Similarly, in HHV-6-positive patients C. pneumoniae infections were found in 3 of 31 patients (9.7%), whereas in HHV-6-negative patients C. pneumoniae infections were found in 5 of 69 patients (7.3%) (Table 3). Thus there appeared to be no preference for particular combinations of co-infections in CFS patients.
Chronic infections appear to be a rather common feature of CFS. Many patients report that their CFS signs and symptoms slowly evolved after acute infections, chemical exposures, multiple vaccinations, severe trauma or other conditions that are associated with immune suppression and opportunistic infections. Previously we studied North American and European CFS patients and found that most showed evidence of mycoplasmal infections (6, 19, 20). Others who studied CFS patients also found evidence of widespread mycoplasmal infections (7-9). When we examined the incidence of particular mycoplasmal infections in North American CFS patients, we found that most patients had multiple infections (two or more species of Mycoplasma), which were for the most part combinations of M. fermentans and other Mycoplasma species (19). In our study on the prevalence of multiple mycoplasmal co-infections in CFS patients we found that double or triple infections occurred only when one of the species was M. pneumoniae and/or M. fermentans (19). In a study on European CFS patients a slightly different picture was found (6). Over two-thirds (68.6%) of 261 consecutive patients seen at a CFS clinic in Belgium were found to show evidence of Mycoplasmas in their blood. In contrast to North American patients, however, the most common species found was M. hominis, and there was a lower overall rate of multiple mycoplasmal co-infections in the European CFS patients. This could indicate differences in demography and exposures between North American and Belgian CFS patients. We also found that more than 50% of North American patients with rheumatoid arthritis had mycoplasmal infections, and in the majority of these patients multiple mycoplasmal co-infections infections were found (18).
Infections of the class Mollicutes can invade a variety of tissues but they can also present as superficial infections (21, 22). Mycoplasmas are found commonly in the oral cavity, urogenital tract and as symbiotic gut flora, but some species can cause acute and chronic illnesses when they penetrate into the blood vascular system and systemically colonize organs and tissues (4, 5, 22-23). For example, M. penetrans, M. fermentans, M. hominis and M. pirum can enter a variety of tissues and cells and cause systemic signs and symptoms. Mycoplasmas have also been shown to have a complex relationship with the immune system. They are very effective at evading host immune responses, and Mycoplasmas can cause changes in cytokine production (24, 25). In addition to CFS, Mycoplasmas are thought to contribute to patients' morbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (22, 26), systemic lupus erythematosis (27), demyelinating and axonal neuropathies (28), HIV-AIDS (29, 30) and chronic respiratory conditions (31-33).
In CFS patients we found that multiple co-infections involving Mycoplasmas were common (19 and the results here), and such mycoplasmal co-infections also occurred with C. pneumoniae and HHV-6. mycoplasmal infections have been reported as co-infections with other microorganisms (29, 30). In some cases synergism with other infectious agents has been seen (34).
Certain types of non-mycoplasmal infections are commonly found in CFS patients. One of the most common viral infections found is HHV-6 (11-13). HHV-6 appears to play a role in several chronic illnesses (12, 13). Although several studies have associated HHV-6 with CFS (13, 35-38), there are also reports that could not find an association with CFS (39, 40). Although HHV-6 infections are commonly found in children, in adults such infections are considered latent but can be reactivated in certain illness states. In CFS patients HHV-6 is frequently reactivated and appears in blood leukocytes and blood plasma. In contrast, in control subjects HHV-6 may be present as a latent infection, and although some active HHV-6 may be found in controls, it is generally found at lower levels compared to CFS patients (11-13). After peripheral blood mononuclear cells from CFS patients were cultured, specific HHV-6 glycoprotiens could be found in the culture medium using monoclonal antibodies. Also, HHV-6 genes could be found using nested PCR (17). The peripheral leukocytes from a majority of CFS patients showed active HHV-6 infections. Most of these patients test positive using antibodies reactive with the HHV-6A variant (11-13).
The use of PCR techniques for detection of microorganism infections in patients has been questioned in studies where different methods were used in different laboratories without validation. The PCR tests that we used are very sensitive and highly specific. These tests are a dramatic improvement on the relatively insensitive serum antibody tests that are routinely used to assay for systemic infections. For example, in the determination of mycoplasmal infections we used primer sets for various genes found in specific species (18-20). Since some primers that have been used to detect Mycoplasma species are capable of possible cross-reactions with Mycoplasma-related organisms (41), we used multiple unique primer set and conditions that detect only specific Mycoplasma species. As in a previous study (20), we examined the reliability of the methods by performing multiple assays, and the results were completely reproducible. The sensitivity of Mycoplasma detection by the described method was assessed by the detection of control Mycoplasma and by internal Southern blot hybridization using Mycoplasma-specific probes. Using serial dilutions of Mycoplasma DNA the method was able to detect as low as a few fg of DNA (20). In other experiments, Mycoplasma was added to control blood samples at various concentrations. We were able to detect specific products down to a few ccu/ml blood. We have used a specific DNA isolation procedure to avoid inhibitors, contaminating nucleases and protein complexing. With the use of specific Southern hybridization the procedure can result in specific test results of high sensitivity and can detect a few microorganisms in a clinical sample (19, 20).
The multiple co-infections in CFS probably play an important role in determining the severity of systemic signs and symptoms found in CFS patients (19, 23). Since CFS patients that previously tested positive for mycoplasmal infections have benefited from therapies directed at their chronic infections (5, 22, 23), we consider it important that such infections be carefully considered in the clinical management of CFS.
1. Holmes GP, Kaplan JE et al. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108:387-389.
2. Fukuda K, Strauss SE et al. The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:953-959.
3. Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung H-Y. Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. JAMA 1996; 276:1473-1479.
4. Nicolson GL, Nasralla M, Haier J, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic mycoplasmal infections in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndromes: relationship to Gulf War Illness. Biomed Ther 1998; 16:266-271.
5. Nicolson GL, Nasralla M, Franco AR, et al. Diagnosis and Integrative Treatment of Intracellular Bacterial Infections in Chronic Fatigue and Fibromyalgia Syndromes, Gulf War Illness, Rheumatoid Arthritis and other Chronic Illnesses. Clin Pract Alt Med 2000; 1:92-102.
6. Nils J, Nicolson GL, De Becker P, et al. Prevalence of mycoplasmal infections in European CFS patients. Examination of four Mycoplasma species. Submitted for publication.
7. Vojdani A, Choppa PC, Tagle C, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma genus and Mycoplasma fermentans by PCR in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1998; 22: 355-365.
8. Huang W, See D, Tiles J. The prevalence of Mycoplasma incognitus in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of normal controls or patients with AIDS or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 231:457-467.
9. Choppa PC, Vojdani A, Tagle C, et al. Multiplex PCR for the detection of Mycoplasma fermentans, M. hominis and M. penetrans in cell cultures and blood samples of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Mol Cell Probes 1998; 12: 301-308.
10. Chia JKS, Chia LY. Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: a treatable cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:452-453.
11. Braun DK, Dominguez G, Pellett PE. Human herpesvirus-6. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997; 10:521-567.
12. Campadelli-Fiume G, Mirandela P, Menetti L. Human herpesvirus-6: an emerging pathogen. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5:353-366.
13. Patnaik M, Komaroff AL, Conley C, Orjin-Amaine EA, Peter JB. Prevalence of IgM antibodies to human herpesvirus-6 early antigen in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Infect Dis 1995; 172:1164-1167.
14. Nicolson GL, Nasralla MY, Haier J et al. mycoplasmal infections in chronic illnesses: Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndromes, Gulf War Illness, HIV-AIDS and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Med Sentinel 1999; 5:172-176.
15. Nicolson GL. Chronic infections as a common etiology for many patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Gulf War Illnesses. Intern J Med 1998; 1:42-46.
16. Walch CM, Zainal NZ, Middleton SJ, et al. A family history study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Psych Genet 2001; 11:123-128.
17. Nicolson GL, Nasralla MY, Nicolson NL, Haier J. High prevalence of mycoplasmal infections in symptomatic (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) family members of Mycoplasma-positive Gulf War Illness patients. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 2002; 10:in press.
18. Haier J, Nasralla M, Franco RA, et al. Detection of mycoplasmal infections in blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol 1999; 38:504-509.
19. Nasralla M, Haier J, Nicolson GL. Multiple mycoplasmal infections detected in blood of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and / or Fibromyalgia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 18:859-865.
20. Nasralla MY, Haier J, Nicolson NL, Nicolson GL. Examination of Mycoplasmas in blood of 565 chronic illness patients by polymerase chain reaction. Intern J Med Biol Environ 2000; 28(1):15-23.
21. Baseman J, Tully J. Mycoplasmas: sophisticated, reemerging, and burdened by their notoriety. Emerg Infect Dis 1997; 3:21-32.
22. Nicolson GL, Nasralla M, Nicolson NL. The pathogenesis and treatment of mycoplasmal infections. Antimicrob Infect Dis Newsl 1999; 17:81-88.
23. Nicolson GL, Nasralla M, Franco AR, et al. mycoplasmal infections in fatigue illnesses: Chronic Fatigue and Fibromyalgia Syndromes, Gulf War Illness and Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 2000; 6(3/4):23-39.
24. Shibata K, Hasebe A, Sasaki T, Watanabe T: Mycoplasma salivarium induces interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in human gingival fibroblasts. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1997; 19:275-283.
25. Brenner C, Wróblewski H, Le Henaff M, Montagnier L, Blanchard A: Spiralin, a mycoplasmal membrane lipoprotein, induces T-cell-independent B-cell blastogenesis and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Infect Immun 1997; 65:4322-4329.
26. Johnson S, Sidebottom D, Bruckner F, Collins D. Identification of Mycoplasma fermentans in synovial fluid samples from arthritis patients with inflammatory disease. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 90-93.
27. Ginsburg KS, Kundsin RB, Walter CW, Schur PH. Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in women with systemic lupus erythematosis. Arthritis Rheumat 1992; 35:429-433.
28. Greenlee JE, Rose JW. Controversies in neurological infectious diseases. Semin Neurol 2000; 20:375-386.
29. Hawkins RE, Rickman LS, Vermund SH, et al. Association of Mycoplasma and human immunodeficiency virus infection: detection of amplified Mycoplasma fermentans DNA in blood. J Infect Dis 1992; 165:581-585.
30. Montagnier L, Blanchard A. Mycoplasmas as cofactors in infection due to the immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17 (Suppl 1):S309-315.
31. Kraft M, Cassell GH, Henson JE, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the airways of adults with chronic asthma. Am J Respirat Critical Care Med 1998; 158:998-1001.
32. Gil JC, Cedillo RL, Mayagoitia BG, Paz MD. Isolation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae from asthmatic patients. Annu Allergy 1993; 70:23-25.
33. Layani-Milon M-P, Gras I, Valette M, Luciani J, Stagnara J, Aymard M, Lina B. Incidence of upper respiratory tract Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections among outpatients in Rhône-Alpes, France, during five successive winter periods. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:1721-1726.
34. Kok T, Higgins G. Prevalence of respiratory viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in sputum samples from unselected adult patients. Pathology 1997; 29:300-302.
35. Wagner M, Krueger GRF, Ablashi DV, Whitman JE. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): a critical evaluation of testing for active human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) infection: a review of data on 107 cases. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 1996; 5:3-16.
36. Zorsenon M, Colle R, Rukh G et al. Active HHV-6 infection in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients from Italy: new data. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 1996; 6:103-113.
37. Knox K, Brewer JH, Carrigan DR. Persistent active human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infections in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 1999; 2:245-246.
38. Ablashi D, Eastman HB, Owen CB, Roman MM, et al. Frequent HHV-6 reactivation in multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients. J Clin Virol 2000; 16:179-191.
39. Wallace HL, Natelson B, Gruse W, Hay J. Human herpesviruses in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6:216-223.
40. Reeves WC, Stamey FR, Black JB, Mawie AC, Stewart JA, Pellett PE. Human herpesviruses 6 and 7 in chronic fatigue syndrome: a case control study. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31:48-52.
41. Van Kuppeveld FJM, Van der Logt JTM, Angulo AF, et al. Genus- and species-specific identification of Mycoplasmas by 16S rRNA amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58:2606-2615.
Table 1. Patient demographic data.
n Mean age
(SD) Range Males (%) Females (%)
Patients 100 39.7 (8.9) 18-66 28 (28) 72 (72)
Controls 100 34.6 (9.1) 21-58 31 (31) 69 (69)
Female patients 72 39.8 (9.8) 18-66 0 (0.0) 72 (100.0)
Male patients 28 39.2 (10.3) 20-60 28 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Table 2. Comparison of chronic infections between CSF patients and healthy subjects.
(%) P Mycoplasma
infected (%) P C. pneumoniae
infected (%) P
CFS patients 29 (29) 31 (31) - 51 (51) - 8 (8) -
Control subjects 88 (88) 9 (9) P<0.05 7 (7) P<0.001 1 (1) P<0.01
Table 3. Prevalence of Mycoplasma species, C. pneumoniae and HHV-6 infections in 100 CFS patients.
Type of infection n % of total % of mycoplasma-positive
None 49 49 -
M. pneumoniae* 29 29 56.9
M. fermentans* 22 22 43.1
M. honinis* 16 16 31.4
M. penetrans* 8 8 15.7
Single mycoplasmal infection 29 29 56.9
Multiple mycoplasmal infections 22 22 43.1
M. fermentans +M. hominis 7 7 13.7
M. fermentans +M. pneumoniae 10 10 19.6
M. pneumoniae +M. hominis 3 3 5.9
M. fermentans +M. hominis + M. pneumoniae 2 2 3.9
HHV-6 31 31 -
HHV-6 - Mycoplasma 15 15 -
HHV-6 + Mycoplasma 16 16 31.4
C. pneumoniae 8 8 -
C. pneumoniae - Mycoplasma 4 4 -
C. pneumoniae + Mycoplasma 4 4 7.8
C. pneumoniae - HHV 5 5 -
C. pneumoniae + HHV 3 3 -
* alone or in combination with another species of Mycoplasma
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites!